Why don't we use short urls anymore?

Solution
because the previous way allowed for iteration of resources. Which can be a problem when you don't want everyone and their dog scraping the entirety of your site wasting your network and compute resources. Also to a lesser extent there is a security aspect of being able to iterate over all the users of the site.

UUIDs mostly solve this, though as you can see they are not very "human friendly" but that was considered an acceptable trade off. Also UUIDs have an advantage of being a mostly built in supported data type not needing a bunch of code to make a custom unique id implementation.
Group Leader
Joined
Aug 23, 2023
Messages
47
Contributor
Joined
Jan 19, 2018
Messages
480
because the previous way allowed for iteration of resources. Which can be a problem when you don't want everyone and their dog scraping the entirety of your site wasting your network and compute resources. Also to a lesser extent there is a security aspect of being able to iterate over all the users of the site.

UUIDs mostly solve this, though as you can see they are not very "human friendly" but that was considered an acceptable trade off. Also UUIDs have an advantage of being a mostly built in supported data type not needing a bunch of code to make a custom unique id implementation.
 
Last edited:
Solution
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Mar 6, 2019
Messages
367
It clearly works better in terms of perfomance, but for a person who bookmarks like myself the old way it meant changing a whole bunch manually so they didn't stop working. Some months ago it happened to me, and the only answer I got from the staff was that the title page was working properly but I was questioned for using legacy when they stopped using it. Basically, adapt, even I had to change from XP to Windows 7 and then to 10 so I could keep working.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top