Mangadex to purge titles for legal reasons

Forum Oji-san
Supporter
Joined
Apr 26, 2020
Messages
7,370
i created an account just to squash this... while mangadex COULD be removing it because of texas law, texas law is 100% illegal and thus if they ever challenged anyone for anything loli related it would be a slam dunk case to squash their law, the supreme court has ruled numerous times on content that includes "lolicon" in it, and its a form of freedom of expression, courts across the united states have also confirmed that supreme court ruling like with a man in indiana charged with 2 counts of CP because of hentai/manga of lolicon content, the courts agreed with the interpretation that the supreme court ruled lolicon content protected under first amendment grounds. TEXAS law has the EXACT same wording as the federal law congress tried to pass in 1996 that the supreme court struck down for being "overbroad" including stuff in it that is protected as it does not contain real children in it.
Two points on this:
1. No one really wants to be the test case.
2. Have you seen the Supreme Court recently?
 
Fed-Kun's army
Joined
Feb 15, 2026
Messages
9
Stop the misinformation. Titles being removed depict sexual activity between characters that are minors, either in appearance (handled on a case-by-case basis) or confirmed in the dialogue. It's about law and compliance with it. If you jerk it off to little kids, go and do it elsewhere; there are sites that specialise in that.
ah there we go, found the stupid ass post from twitter, i was looking for it, what a dogshit take, let this be a lesson for anyone who is trying to make a site for manga/anime, never put yourself under places like UK law, never be a fucking dumbass as well who doesn't fight said stupid ass laws that not only take away freedom of expression but literally deny sharing of an artists work. anyway my job here is done, im going to go to one of many better sites listed on the index, theres hundreds of sites for manga and ones that have way more and better content than this piece of shit website.
 
Fed-Kun's army
Joined
Feb 15, 2026
Messages
9
Two points on this:
1. No one really wants to be the test case.
2. Have you seen the Supreme Court recently?
supreme court doesn't care, the most recent case from courts was in a RED STATE and was in 2024, courts care about previous cases, and they care about the constitution, nothing more, the constitution no matter how you interpret, clearly states that the government can't abridge the freedom of speech, freedom of speech includes expression which means it includes ART, which loli is art, these rulings go back all the way to before porn itself was even mainstream and loli wasn't even as big of an art form back then... the supreme court nowadays would not care.


point 1 was addressed as well with this... its not a test case since you can point at previous rulings, the court case in 2024 was dismissed on first amendment grounds and the dude listed 5 different cases for why it should be, and they agreed (even the state agreed)
 
Active member
Joined
Feb 15, 2026
Messages
2
Honestly, I don't see much issue. Piracy sites are not as "underground" as people make them out to be, you could find dozens in minutes. The whining is for nothing.
Oh it is pretty easy to find new sites that are not pro censorship, that's for sure, there's a lot out there

The problem comes with having this sort of mentality on this age and era, it's dangerous to see that these sort of people go around and are able to do this sort of stuff, at least making people aware of it it's important
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jun 7, 2023
Messages
5,184
Enjoy fantisizing over fictional kids being lewd I guess, nice self-report
Man this remind me of the case of Mike Diana the comic artist who were framed for murder and thought to be serial killer because his comic have lot of obscene and gruesome stuff.

People think he is automatically guilty because he draw obscene stuff and anti religion. But it's just drawing in the end.

After the further investigation he was innocent, but his drawing certainly are very gore. He didn't do anything and all just his imagination put into paper.

if depiction of fiction aren't allowed what about all media who have body horror and gore ?

All the revenge manga with excessive blood. Things like mortal Kombat too should be illegal because people get mutilated. Breaking Bad and Better Call Saul have a lot of scene about drug, cartel, and dirty lawyer that help criminals. Its all illegal thing that if happen in real life gonna get you big trouble. Yet nothing, no one arrested, because what happened in fiction didn't actually happen.
 
Fed-Kun's army
Joined
Feb 15, 2026
Messages
9
Honestly, I don't see much issue. Piracy sites are not as "underground" as people make them out to be, you could find dozens in minutes. The whining is for nothing.
agreed, pretty sure everyone is shitting on them BEFORE doing that, thats what i came here to do, it is an idiotic choice, it feels like they are trying to do what crunchyroll did, and we all know how shit that place is now so...
 
Fed-Kun's army
Joined
Feb 15, 2026
Messages
9
:huh:
Like they did with Roe v Wade.
yeah, the court saw that nothing in the constitution states that abortion is a right... go read the constitution, im not going to sit here and argue random politics with you, im just stating the facts of the supreme court, you can go read the 14th amendment if you want, nothing in there includes a right to an abortion, roe v wade ruling makes it so THE PEOPLE can decide whether its legal or not, aka up to the states, the constitution only protects rights and each state can limit or unlimit whatever they want not related to that. i am not here to sit here and argue about every single supreme court ruling... if you want that, go to twitter.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jan 20, 2018
Messages
53
As noted upthread, they are registered as a corporate entity in the UK, and are therefore subject to those laws.
Completely and utterly false.

The jurisdiction of a server is where the server is located, NOT where the company is located.

By your logic, if a company is located in America, but they own a server in Saudi Arabia, that server doesn't need to follow Saudi Arabia laws.

But that's incorrect, the server is in Saudi Arabia, so it must follow Saudi Arabia laws, even though the company is not in Saudi Arabia.

The same logic applies in reverse. If a company is in Saudi Arabia, but they own a server in America, that server follows American laws, not Saudi Arabia laws.

You have zero understanding of jurisdiction, or international laws.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top