Something I find interesting that is never directly acknowledged even in the novels (to my knowledge, anyways) is the fact that Michiko Abarato's accounting of her husband's disappearance included the detail of a single child's shoe on the balcony pointing inwards towards the room. Considering the child here is missing a shoe...
It's rather interesting and a great little microcosm of one of the parts I love about the storytelling of the otherside as a whole — it is portrayed in a way that makes it impossible to think of it as anything BUT a clue to what is really going on... but that's not how that world works. That's not how
ghost stories work. Sorawo says it herself, logic doesn't apply, cause and effect isn't real. It's patterns arranged in a way that looks like they're communicating meaning, but they're not really. This leaves me as a reader noticing the shoe, instictively thinking 'aha, this could help figure out the nature of this child,' and then having to stop and remind myself that the author is both intentionally putting these 'clues' in AND telling us to not fall for the trick and see them as clues. It's just a lure, meant to entice characters in fiction into figuring out a mystery, and readers into crafting theories. It captures the internet ghost story feel
perfectly.
Or maybe it isn't, and the Otherside is trying to convey meaning in the only way it knows how. Maybe the meaning is there if one is just to listen. To lean in a bit closer and try to understand... just a little more......
