@comeonnow0 Wow, you're wrong on so many levels.
No, demographics is not the major consideration, the actual plot is. And regarding your talk about antagonists all being male. That is not a trope in harems, that is a trope in most stories period. Males are typically the main antagonists in stories. So to call this a harem trop is disingenuous. Of the first 6 chapters, the antagonists were monsters and bandits. A trope in practically all action adventure stories. What is a trope in a lot of harems is a female antagonist appears and kidnaps the MC to try and make him fall for her. It doesn't happen in all harems, but it happens enough to call it a trope. Your example, that is just typical of any story. So it isn't a harem trope. Nice try. The reason I didn't address that one before is because I thought you were joking. Now it seems you really meant that nonsense. Oh and regarding your talk about the male lead being more adept at handling situations. Did you forget that you only read the first 6 chapters? Of course the writer is going to make the main character look competent to start. Funny how you seem to ignore all the failures he suffered in those chapters. In fact, in the 4th chapter (you know, one of the chapters you supposedly read) the MC gets one-shot by a knight. He is far from this OP all knowing mega chad. He starts out with the weakest stats and it is only due to him grinding by killing goblins that he was able to catch up to the rest of his party, but he's still weaker than the vet in his group at the time of your reading. You are likely projecting themes you've seen in other stuff you read. And I'm betting most of it were harems. No wonder you see it everywhere.
Wow, way to change the meaning of harem to encompass anything just to fit your narrative. In this context, when people talk of harem, they generally mean a kind of story in which a male character is accompanied by multiple female characters who are in love with him. Interesting how it isn't the case in this story. All you have to go from is demographics. If all the characters were of 1 sex, you wouldn't assume it was a harem. If anything, you'd probably assume the female lead was a lesbian judging by what the MC thinks about the girls. Still, no harem vibe. Because all you have is demographics, the other 2 talking points weren't even indicative of harems, but story telling as a whole or weren't even present in the 6 chapters you claim to have read.
No, but it seems you are stupid. The reason I addressed your car analogy was because it was an inaccurate analogy to summarize this argument. But it seems you didn't understand the context. Not surprising considering your "harem vibes" from a story that isn't a harem.
Yeah, I'm not buying your "herp derp, I used 'high school age' loosely because of where I'm from." You likely used high school because you thought they were in high school. And no, none of the girls in his group are romantically involved with him. That's a fact.
No, I didn't put in "my" definition of what a harem is. I put in the definition. Or an abbreviation of it. Let's see what the actual meaning is as relating to genre. "Harem is a kind of story in Japanese anime and manga where a male character is surrounded and loved by many female characters. ... The term orginates from the Arabic word "hareem" which literally means women and was also used to refer to one man many women like a sultan hareem." So, wrong again. You're not wrong because it doesn't meet "my" definition of what a harem is. You're wrong because it doesn't meet the actual definition of a harem. You're crying because I'm correcting you on the actual facts about the series, this you cry, claiming I'm using "my" definition of a harem. So now the truth comes out. You were never using the real meaning of harem during your arguments, you were using your own made up meaning for it only to project that I was using my own made up meaning. Dude, your mind is scrambling. I don't use my own individual meaning for words, I use the universally understood meaning for words. I can see now why you accused others of not reading or understanding your posts when they reply to you. You're practically usinging your own language. No doubt anytime the argument doesn't go the way you want, you'll just fall back on "duh, I'm just using my own meaning for words. It's your fault for not understanding." You are such a try hard. This is hilarious!
Okay, since you clearly don't understand context, I'll summarize. In your previous vapid rant, you said "Look at the specific odds. Assume the population is 50% male, 50% female. In a world of random chances, it's a 50% chance the MC is male. It's then a 25% chance that the MC is male and the first companion is female. Then 12.5% that MC is male, first companion female, and second companion female as well. Then it's 6.25% that it's male, female, female, and female. Look at those actual odds." You were talking about the odds of this happening. You weren't talking about the author making it that way. My response was this wasn't done by random chance. All the characters were chosen by the game god. But now you're moving the goal post to "duh we're talking about story genre, the author picked them." I don't even have to ask if you're stupid. I already got the confirmation. And you're dishonest. Nice strawman fallacy. You're comparing my statement that 1 male being allied with 3 girls doesn't make them a harem to "dah, 1 male on a planet with only women." The idiocy is all coming from your side. Likely due to all the harem stuff you absorb.
The projection coming from you is palpable. You accuse me of being bias and self-sentered then you follow up with "I don't have to prove that I am correct about this being a harem series." All this time you were trying to act like your opinions were based on the 6 chapters you claim to have read. But here lies the truth. Yeah, I know you admit that you were wrong to call this a harem. I'm saying your reasoning, or lack there of, for assuming it would be a harem.
Well, actually there are objective standards for what constitutes a harem. It's a word for a reason. We give meaning to words. And we, that is to say sane people agree to that standard. In this context, as shown in the definition above, a "harem is a kind of story in Japanese anime and manga where a male character is surrounded and loved by many female characters." Your talk of
Literally every vapid reply you make, you only further illustrate that harems is your main intake of literary media. Just because all the content you read is a harem, doesn't make this a harem. The only trope this series has that is in many harems is it starts with 1 male character working together with 2 female characters, then a 3rd joins the group. The main element in all harems (the romance) is non-existent. Thus negating any expectation of this being a harem.
That's not what the disagreement is regarding. By making up your own meaning of words then complaining that no one understands your grunting as you change things to mean whatever you want in a given situation. That is self-centered.
And regarding you juvenile challenge. Your description of this series is off. Firstly the male lead doesn't show above average proficiency and skill. He fails quite often. Secondly, as of the current population 2 other males and a lesbian are in the group. Your poorly summarized description of this series would inevitably provide only harems to appear in any given catalog search and you know that. Which is why you intentionally mischaracterized the plot. Your dishonesty is clear to see.
Hell, I can be just as dishonest. Find 3 anime or manga with a group comprising of 3 straight males, 3 straight females and a lesbian woman that IS a harem. That's just as disingenuous as your poorly summarized description. But, I've come to expect this from you.