Nothing new there.Also nuns are now accepting bribes, lol.
Actually, money can mirror the popularity of a store/service. While pricing can then affect the results (that one super high priced dress did tip the scale in the end), if the product isn't liked or affordable to most people, there won't be any profit and the store won't be popular. It's more "how much the people liked the service they paid" and less "how much the manager made"... I guess.So they judged it on money earned. Not popularity, which is what they agreed upon. Shame. Missed making an intelligent plot out of it.
Also, date. Date date, not something something excuse that looks like a date. Bluntness is required to combat density.
Um, actually, there's a difference here. Popularity can be something that doesn't benefit the store on its own, but can benefit the town and people better.Actually, money can mirror the popularity of a store/service.
Which is why I say "can", I know that raw profite isn't always an accurate way to gauge popularity. But for this kind of contest, it might be the best option, in my opinion anyway.Um, actually, there's a difference here. Popularity can be something that doesn't benefit the store on its own, but can benefit the town and people better.
Could've, should've, might've. But it's not what they actually agreed on in this particular contest.Which is why I say "can", I know that raw profite isn't always an accurate way to gauge popularity. But for this kind of contest, it might be the best option, in my opinion anyway.