@NARKist
I'm not making any assumptions that she did or did not manipulate her families into thinking that she's good. I don't see how that would help her case if it were true. Rather, that seems like it would further incriminate her.
@Nunally
I'm very curious about what you mean by no "real harm." I mean, it's a work of fiction, so in that sense none of it is real, but for everything else, there was plenty of harm to go around.
In their failed attempt to discover a priori knowledge, Rene Descartes made the famous statement "Cogito, Ergo Sum." I think, therefore I am. In that sense, damaging one's mind is more harmful than damaging someone's body. I definitely would not want to live in the dystopian world where the integrity of flesh is the only requirement to prove lack of harm.
Even people living in isolated villages bleed when pricked, laugh when tickled, die when poisoned, and want revenge when wronged. Appropriating people's free will to serve one's own needs is immoral regardless of when or where.