Jimi na Kensei wa Sore Demo Saikyou Desu - Vol. 4 Ch. 36

Active member
Joined
Jun 1, 2018
Messages
1,543
This whole story gives me weird vibes, I thought it would be a peaceful, happy-go-lucky kind of vibe but then he starts beheading people....
 
Active member
Joined
Feb 8, 2018
Messages
124
Oh Thank God That negotiations with Ukyou was hanled nicely n peacefully. But I hope its not an act
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Oct 18, 2019
Messages
877
Did they even asked for his treasures? Ukyou seems to be really inept for his job.
 
Double-page supporter
Joined
Apr 14, 2019
Messages
482
Lesson of the day: Bow down to your kings, peasants! Don't be brave, just save your lives.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Jan 28, 2018
Messages
4,831
Well, I guess this manga is over and I can unsubscribe at peace.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
May 10, 2018
Messages
521
I suppose I need to go back and read the last several chapters again. I don't understand why he is surrendering.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Feb 3, 2018
Messages
3,399
@Zones
because now that the king knows what kind of guy ukyou is, there's no way ukyou can win the war. For a ruler that values his people above all else, he essentially has endless weaknesses, particularly if he is the only one who can really protect them. Ukyou is surrendering because his people will be safe, and that's all he actually wants. Being a leader isn't the thing that really matters to him.
 
Double-page supporter
Joined
Mar 23, 2018
Messages
655
@Oeconomist I don't know what your issue is but I am not delivering criticism, I am not saying there is anything wrong with it, all I said was that I PERSONALLY found it a little funny. hell, I even said that I ALSO enjoy consuming "bad content" but only so far as I am still getting enjoyment out of it. if all I had after every chapter/episode/book was complaints, I'm not going to keep consuming that content

I find it hilarious when people complain about content but continue to read/watch/consume something they no longer find joy in, it's cathartic to me.

And there's really nothing funny about it. As I said, the business of willfully consuming failed entertainment has itself been frequently discussed and analyzed. For some people (though I am not amongst them) it's the dynamic of Mystery Science Theater. For some, it's a matter of applied æsthetic theory. For some, it's applied to social theory.

I am not and HAVE not disagreed with you on the subject of willfully consuming failed media, where pray tell did I disagree with you or offer thoughts to the contrary?

I didn't say it was funny in general, I said that I find it funny I don't know what more you could want from me?

and hold your horse's, Comedy Police, who are you to tell me what I can or can't find funny.
And there's really nothing funny about it.

no one determines what is or isn't funny. comedy is subjective and what one finds comedy in, is also subjective. while YOU may not find comedy in people complaining about "failed content" but continuing to consume it I do

To the extent that it could be characterized as jumping, it was really a jumping back. (But I doubt that the word “jump” was well chosen in the first place.

"It was really a jumping back" except I never jumped at you in the first place for you to "jump " back at me you inferred my original comment to be some kind of criticism on these people when I literally said what I felt, "I find it hilarious", but you're absolutely right that "jump" wasn't the best word but I couldn't think of the right word to get across what I meant so, next time I'll call my proofreader and editor to make sure I am using the proper words, grammar, and sentence structure so I don't bother you anymore.

I am not going to continue to sit here and defend my comments to someone who dumps a bunch of studies on my head because you misunderstood what I meant with my original comment.

I'm sorry, thank you, and have a good day
 
Banned
Joined
Mar 23, 2020
Messages
1,055
Dafuq?

With all the back story you showed for this dude, you "end" it, like this ? Either the dude is going to double cross them as soon as he gets close to the child OR the author's screwed up portraying a character when writing this story.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top