Otome Game Sekai wa Mob ni Kibishii Sekai desu (Republic Arc) - Ch. 4

Dex-chan lover
Joined
Apr 1, 2020
Messages
1,285
Could be misinterpreting it, but because the previous panels are his internal thoughts, shouldn’t the speech in page 26 from Brad instead of the Republic guys?
If yes, the previous scene showed him thinking of what Leon would do, so it’s probably something like “do your worst” to his assailants.
 
Last edited:
Aggregator gang
Joined
Nov 21, 2024
Messages
31
Last edited:
MD@Home
Joined
Jun 10, 2018
Messages
704
Which villainess? Surely you don't mean Angelica or the Principality's princesses? None of them were that. An actual example of one in the original story was the Count's daughter that was allied with pirates and she was a carbon copy of Pierre, down to the very facial expressions, just generswapped.
Well... Angelica was the antagonist of the first game, so I'd say she very much qualifies as a villainess.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Feb 23, 2024
Messages
835
Well... Angelica was the antagonist of the first game, so I'd say she very much qualifies as a villainess.
She never really acted as one in the story. If it's the game that the MC's nameless original persona played you mean, then it's heavily implied that she wasn't one in there either and the actual villainess was a possesed Olivia who worked behind the scenes in order to orchestrate her downfall. The source of that is mainly a spinoff, but there are also scenes in the main novel as well, when Olivia sees events that never happened, in which she was seemingly responsible for having Luxion destroy Holfort.
 
MD@Home
Joined
Jun 10, 2018
Messages
704
She never really acted as one in the story. If it's the game that the MC's nameless original persona played you mean, then it's heavily implied that she wasn't one in there either and the actual villainess was a possesed Olivia who worked behind the scenes in order to orchestrate her downfall. The source of that is mainly a spinoff, but there are also scenes in the main novel as well, when Olivia sees events that never happened, in which she was seemingly responsible for having Luxion destroy Holfort.
You might want to reread chapter 4 of the first manga. And yes, obviously there was more to her than just being "bad" for the sake of it, but that was the entire point!

Aside from a couple of auxiliary characters who didn't really matter as much, I simply had the impression that all major players, from the protagonist to his sister (both past and present life), from Angelica to the "capture targets" of the first game, all had way more depth to them than what we're currently getting. That seemingly irredeemable stalker in the current chapters was supposed to be one of the male protagonists of the second game, for crying out loud. They may get better characterizations later on, but currently, the tone of the story is quite off-putting.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Feb 23, 2024
Messages
835
You might want to reread chapter 4 of the first manga. And yes, obviously there was more to her than just being "bad" for the sake of it, but that was the entire point!
I recently have and still don't know what you're getting at. Save us both some time and point out exactly what you think makes her a villainess there, so there's no guessing involved.

Aside from a couple of auxiliary characters who didn't really matter as much, I simply had the impression that all major players, from the protagonist to his sister (both past and present life), from Angelica to the "capture targets" of the first game, all had way more depth to them than what we're currently getting. That seemingly irredeemable stalker in the current chapters was supposed to be one of the male protagonists of the second game, for crying out loud. They may get better characterizations later on, but currently, the tone of the story is quite off-putting.
While there is no denying that the best things this series had to offer ended with volume 3 of the novel, you're oversimplyfing by saying it's just "auxillary" characters. Those were all what amounted to the antagonists of their own arcs, you know. People like the mentioned count's daughter, the elven supremacists, the aristocrat leading the Principality's forces - all cookie cutter villains, pretty much one-dimensional. Pierre is just like that and not to spoil too much, has about the same amount of relevance.

Also, the ones that seemed to have more going for them most often only had it on the surface, paper thin. The black knight, for example was just a crazy old guy obsessed with taking revenge on Holfort, there was literally nothing else to his character. Unlike the princesses, who were raised in ignorance, he was old enough to know the true score between the nations (he was part of establishing it) and it's circumstances, but he never even acknowledged that and kept blood-knighting. The original "capture targets" are also one-dimensional to the point of physical pain. In fact, having to put up with this fact is part of Marie's everlasting punishment itself. The author seems to acknowledge that himself, since when they do get character development opportunities... well, let's just say it's played for laughs and ends up making them even bigger simpletons.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Mar 30, 2023
Messages
1,576
Leon's [Heroine & Villainess Charmer: EX] has activated. And thank you for the chapter! 🙏

Also yeeeesh those wanna noble tree savages act just as bad as noble women back in the kingdom, arguably worse even
 
MD@Home
Joined
Jun 10, 2018
Messages
704
I recently have and still don't know what you're getting at. Save us both some time and point out exactly what you think makes her a villainess there, so there's no guessing involved.
At the beginning of the chapter Angelica is introduced as the villainess, with a brief overview of her role in the game. In the next chapter (I did not notice it was already in chapter 5, sorry) she plays the villainess role pretty convincingly, glaring daggers at Marie and trying to separate her from the prince. It does not last, of course, but her introduction in the story is in line with her original role.

While there is no denying that the best things this series had to offer ended with volume 3 of the novel, you're oversimplyfing by saying it's just "auxillary" characters. Those were all what amounted to the antagonists of their own arcs, you know. People like the mentioned count's daughter, the elven supremacists, the aristocrat leading the Principality's forces - all cookie cutter villains, pretty much one-dimensional. Pierre is just like that and not to spoil too much, has about the same amount of relevance.
I... honestly don't remember most of these characters. Maybe that's on me. The one "oh, I'm so evil" type of character I do remember is that psychotic noble you mentioned (Stephanie?), who was indeed aggravating but didn't stick around for long, thankfully. I guess my reaction to the people in these recent chapters were especially negative because I got the impression that they're going to be sticking around for a while, given their major roles in the second game. If that's not the case, that's a relief.

Also, the ones that seemed to have more going for them most often only had it on the surface, paper thin.
What can I say, really? I'll take what I can get. XD The black knight may not have had the deepest characterization ever, but he had more to him than "I'm evil and I'll make you all suffer". For my tastes, that's already enough to make the story interesting.
 
Dex-chan lover
Joined
Feb 23, 2024
Messages
835
At the beginning of the chapter Angelica is introduced as the villainess, with a brief overview of her role in the game. In the next chapter (I did not notice it was already in chapter 5, sorry) she plays the villainess role pretty convincingly, glaring daggers at Marie and trying to separate her from the prince. It does not last, of course, but her introduction in the story is in line with her original role.
But... that wasn't the role she was playing. Her reasons for wanting to keep Marie away were well explained (and she was right). Also, keep in mind that as someone from a ducal house, she could have really leaned into the role and harrased her for real (she was accused for doing just that, but that was prejudice) or far worse. Also, as I mentioned - while it's unknown what went on in the "game" in full, it was lying to the MC at several points, by ommision at the very least. The second one was even worse, turns out it absolutely demonized a whole host of characters that were innocent at worst and victims at times.

I... honestly don't remember most of these characters. Maybe that's on me. The one "oh, I'm so evil" type of character I do remember is that psychotic noble you mentioned (Stephanie?), who was indeed aggravating but didn't stick around for long, thankfully. I guess my reaction to the people in these recent chapters were especially negative because I got the impression that they're going to be sticking around for a while, given their major roles in the second game. If that's not the case, that's a relief.
This will spoil a bit but None of the second game's cast really stick around for long, other than Noelle. You can only have one squad of baka rangers, after all.

What can I say, really? I'll take what I can get. XD The black knight may not have had the deepest characterization ever, but he had more to him than "I'm evil and I'll make you all suffer". For my tastes, that's already enough to make the story interesting.
Ah, but that's just my point - he didn't, really. Don't you remember his whole stick? He allowed himself to fuse with the evil artifact thing, was willing to kill anyone indiscriminately and even roared out himself that he doesn't care about anything, he just wants to kill anyone associated with Holfort. His reason? His family was killed in one of the previous wars with the kingdom (and it wasn't even any unusual event - it was stated that both sides regularily commited atrocities on one another, with the Principality starting it). That's literally it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top