I think what people here did, comparing the incense to drug, is a wrong analogy, in term of hazard, at least. To associate it with all harmful side of drug-abusing is flawed reasoning.
If Chris' words is to be trusted, this incense cause no direct harm to body and only downside would be reduced birthrate, which affect society but not individuals.
If we look at effects, this incense is closer to condom than drugs. This might not be a perfect analogy but surely a better one.
Last time I checked, most of western world still condemning religious countries that ban condom. Do we blindly entrusting law to tell us what is good or bad now?
So, I am asking all of you here, if the story have him smuggle/produce condoms to religious countries instead, would you be against it like this?
Set that aside, I still agree that on risk-reward side, this is stupid. Extremely stupid.