"literal" lol ok
Why?
Because sometimes one prefers to read/write something with more history but not straight up hentai
As much as I also dislike that, there is a large difference between the typical anime ecchi/fanservice shit, and porn involving minors - and not even the whole "oh she looks 12 but she's actually 5000 years old" horseshit. If you don't see the problem there you are too far gone.
Refer back to my earlier comment about you being fucked in the head. Can you honestly not see the difference between a roleplay fetish (yes, a weird one by mine and most people's standards, but harmless), and sexualising an actual child? You seem to take issue with the word "literal", but what else would you call somebody who is in no uncertain terms stated to be 12-13 years old, other than a child? Then again, I should probably have expected some absolutely braindead rationalisation from somebody defending being into kids.
This sentence makes no sense.
Not really
Its because my english is bad or the concept in the sentence
Yeah I didn't think you'd see the difference. The type of people who are into that shit never do. There's not much point in me trying to articulate it - I'm not that good at putting it into words, and if english isn't your first language then that's not gonna help. However, I'll say this - the fact that the character is fictional doesn't matter to me. They are outright stated by the author to be children. Put it this way: if it was still drawn images, but far more realistic rather than an anime art style, would you still be ok with an author drawing kids in those situations?
Your english doesn't seem too bad, except for the last sentence.
Don't cut my words where it makes a good argument for you, you slimy bastard. I said "I have a natural disdain for recycled hentai authors until they prove they can do an actual regular manga. There are tons of shitty smut mangas from adapted LNs and you can tell where the guys who draw the art come from".
I believe it is the NTR that is putting people off.
