Group Leader
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2018
- Messages
- 301
So I've lately seen a lot of hate and sympathy from both readers and other scanlators towards groups that take donations and even though I'm not a scanlator personally anymore, I thought I'd try to discuss it a bit.
First of all let's talk about what kind of groups there are, since I believe that's the most important part about this, there's 4 main kinds of scanlation groups:
1. Groups that take donations and don't pay staff nor explain where any of the money goes.
2. Groups that take donations and pay staff and explain where funds go.
3. Groups that don't take donations because they don't need them.
4. Groups that don't take donations because they're against it.
Now let's discuss each one since I believe that'll help people understand why the opinion on donations can't be simple binary yes's or no's.
1. This type of group is the one you guys usually talk shit about or use as example to talk shit about the type 2 of groups. It's not complicated, they're trying to cash grab without much effort and obviously the quality/speed isn't up to par with type 2 since staff won't be as motivated. Usually the staff are teenagers that don't understand the value of their own time even if it's a hobby. A good example of this was old Trash Scanlations who lied about donation money usage and costs of raws and other costs.
2. Type 2 is pretty simple: They ask for money and put it back into scanlation. More specifically towards paying staff. Good examples are Mangacow or Meraki who were paying every translators that wanted to be paid 5-15$ per chapter. If you remember meraki at their peak they were getting over 1000USD per month on patreon, but that wasn't even enough to pay all translators since imagine there's 8 translators, putting out 20 chapters per month, each costs 10 bucks average, that ammounts to 1600USD. So the quality/speed of that type of group comes from somewhere, and that somewhere is the money invested into the staff. These usually work on popular series to try to get as many donations to cover costs.
3. There's also groups that don't take donations simply because they take scanlations more casually and have fewer staff that do it for fun, these groups usually work on niche series that otherwise nobody would work on. These are almost always passion projects and they do it out of love for the series and these people are commonly older scanlators with financial stability, at least based on the ones I've met, so they just don't try to monetize their time. A good example is LoktarOgar who works on "Out!" and "Bad Boys"
4. This type of group is similar to type 3 but they don't take donations not because they don't need it but simply because they're against it, these are the ones that are either super quiet or try to talk smack about the type 1-2 groups. They usually work on whatever series without any specific genre or popularity rating. They vary from really fast and/or consistent like Helvetica Scans to super slow and inconsistent where they release 2 chapters per year.
Now, if you've read what I tried to explain you might understand that just saying all donation-taking groups are bad or good is wrong, it's more nuanced than that.
I'd like to know your opinions about this, please let's discuss it below.
First of all let's talk about what kind of groups there are, since I believe that's the most important part about this, there's 4 main kinds of scanlation groups:
1. Groups that take donations and don't pay staff nor explain where any of the money goes.
2. Groups that take donations and pay staff and explain where funds go.
3. Groups that don't take donations because they don't need them.
4. Groups that don't take donations because they're against it.
Now let's discuss each one since I believe that'll help people understand why the opinion on donations can't be simple binary yes's or no's.
1. This type of group is the one you guys usually talk shit about or use as example to talk shit about the type 2 of groups. It's not complicated, they're trying to cash grab without much effort and obviously the quality/speed isn't up to par with type 2 since staff won't be as motivated. Usually the staff are teenagers that don't understand the value of their own time even if it's a hobby. A good example of this was old Trash Scanlations who lied about donation money usage and costs of raws and other costs.
2. Type 2 is pretty simple: They ask for money and put it back into scanlation. More specifically towards paying staff. Good examples are Mangacow or Meraki who were paying every translators that wanted to be paid 5-15$ per chapter. If you remember meraki at their peak they were getting over 1000USD per month on patreon, but that wasn't even enough to pay all translators since imagine there's 8 translators, putting out 20 chapters per month, each costs 10 bucks average, that ammounts to 1600USD. So the quality/speed of that type of group comes from somewhere, and that somewhere is the money invested into the staff. These usually work on popular series to try to get as many donations to cover costs.
3. There's also groups that don't take donations simply because they take scanlations more casually and have fewer staff that do it for fun, these groups usually work on niche series that otherwise nobody would work on. These are almost always passion projects and they do it out of love for the series and these people are commonly older scanlators with financial stability, at least based on the ones I've met, so they just don't try to monetize their time. A good example is LoktarOgar who works on "Out!" and "Bad Boys"
4. This type of group is similar to type 3 but they don't take donations not because they don't need it but simply because they're against it, these are the ones that are either super quiet or try to talk smack about the type 1-2 groups. They usually work on whatever series without any specific genre or popularity rating. They vary from really fast and/or consistent like Helvetica Scans to super slow and inconsistent where they release 2 chapters per year.
Now, if you've read what I tried to explain you might understand that just saying all donation-taking groups are bad or good is wrong, it's more nuanced than that.
I'd like to know your opinions about this, please let's discuss it below.