Member
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2018
- Messages
- 184
@riri
How he treated Euph was pretty massive. He committed a massive insult against the most powerful man in the kingdom, who was also his greatest supporter and the core of his faction. Like, that's the stuff that got Robb a Wolves' head.
He's also not mediocre. Mediocre kings are quite good for a country that's as peaceful as their kingdom seems to be. The prince is reckless, prideful and lacks self-awareness. Those are qualities that lead to him making stupid decisions in vainglory like destroying his relations with his biggest benefactor and talking of killing a dragon (Anne has more of a chance of building an F16 than he does of killing a dragon).
It's also qualities that have popped up a number of times in our own world.
Louis XVI was incredibly prideful. Even when he'd been caught by the revolutionaries, he did little more than pay them lip-service. A little
known fact is that the Revolutionaries originally only sought greater liberties in France. Wanting something similar to what Britain had, where the King's powers had been limited many many years ago. But Louis attempted to escape thrice and even wrote a letter where he made clear that he would never accept anything the Revolutionaries put forth and would make them all pay as soon as he was back in power. So they killed him.
Victor Emmanuel III of Italy was very much similar to the prince. He was rather lacking in most regards, but in no way a terrible leader. But, he didn't like the political strife that was brewing in Italy due to different factions like the Fascists and Communists. He decided to make Mussolini the leader of his country (under him) and was the man's staunchest proponent all the way up to when Mussolini was dragged through the streets and hanged. He allowed for Italy becoming Fascist, for Italy joining the war, for atrocities to be committed there and even tried to have the Fascists remain in power after Mussolini was killed. His continual mismanagement lead to Italy, which had been staunchly Royalist, to turn against the king. Even then he refused to make any of the appeasements that his ministers begged him for. It wasn't until the motion had been made to remove the royal household entirely that he made some attempts to save the Royal household, to no avail.
And finally there's Wilhelm II of Germany, who took the incredible position Germany held on the international stage as the supreme nation of the world, and led it into a losing war, bankruptcy and the removal of the Royal line. He in fact was so terrible, he forced age-old rivals like France and England to join together.
How he treated Euph was pretty massive. He committed a massive insult against the most powerful man in the kingdom, who was also his greatest supporter and the core of his faction. Like, that's the stuff that got Robb a Wolves' head.
He's also not mediocre. Mediocre kings are quite good for a country that's as peaceful as their kingdom seems to be. The prince is reckless, prideful and lacks self-awareness. Those are qualities that lead to him making stupid decisions in vainglory like destroying his relations with his biggest benefactor and talking of killing a dragon (Anne has more of a chance of building an F16 than he does of killing a dragon).
It's also qualities that have popped up a number of times in our own world.
Louis XVI was incredibly prideful. Even when he'd been caught by the revolutionaries, he did little more than pay them lip-service. A little
known fact is that the Revolutionaries originally only sought greater liberties in France. Wanting something similar to what Britain had, where the King's powers had been limited many many years ago. But Louis attempted to escape thrice and even wrote a letter where he made clear that he would never accept anything the Revolutionaries put forth and would make them all pay as soon as he was back in power. So they killed him.
Victor Emmanuel III of Italy was very much similar to the prince. He was rather lacking in most regards, but in no way a terrible leader. But, he didn't like the political strife that was brewing in Italy due to different factions like the Fascists and Communists. He decided to make Mussolini the leader of his country (under him) and was the man's staunchest proponent all the way up to when Mussolini was dragged through the streets and hanged. He allowed for Italy becoming Fascist, for Italy joining the war, for atrocities to be committed there and even tried to have the Fascists remain in power after Mussolini was killed. His continual mismanagement lead to Italy, which had been staunchly Royalist, to turn against the king. Even then he refused to make any of the appeasements that his ministers begged him for. It wasn't until the motion had been made to remove the royal household entirely that he made some attempts to save the Royal household, to no avail.
And finally there's Wilhelm II of Germany, who took the incredible position Germany held on the international stage as the supreme nation of the world, and led it into a losing war, bankruptcy and the removal of the Royal line. He in fact was so terrible, he forced age-old rivals like France and England to join together.