@2spiritcherokeeprincess
Firstly, that's apocryphal. Ghandi never said that, but who did was a union leader named Nicholas Klein in 1914. The misattribution comes from the fact Ghandi compiled his essays into a wider anthology.
Also calling Ghandi a leftist is a bit of a misnomer given he wasn't for the abolition of private property and his economic principles were not about collective ownership of the means of production. Granted, some scholars have called Ghandi a socialist but I think such nomenclature is inaccurate as calling the Incan system socialism, as it still values hierarchy and personal property and private businesses, as well as the fact Ghandi is known for wanting national sovereignty above all, which is not a socialist position as they want a world-wide revolution.
@M0NST3R
I think there's a virtue of open-mindedness and tolerance if said open-mindedness if predicated on evidence and the willingness to change based on strength of the argument. When you close yourself from new ideas, you not only make yourself a bigot but prevent yourself from ever improving beyond your current state, which ignores the fact humans are fundamentally imperfect beings that should always be trying to improve themselves.
Though I will take umbrage with the idea only conservatives care about the intentions of the framers of the constitution and how they wrote it because I think those values are meant to be more the bedrock of our society and not meant to be eroded, such as the protections for rights and limitations on the government to infringe on them, which I think should be nonpartisan. Plus there's the fact that the liberal values of the constitution and the enlightenment philosophy with underlies it is more or less the system of ideals which this nation was formed from and whenever we have ignored or not followed those values (ie Slavery, Japanese Internment, Jim Crow, etc.) it has always reflected poorly on the nation as a whole.
Though I'd argue a lot of neoconseratives don't actually care about the traditions and the values of the founding fathers as much as their bottom line and propagation of the political machine, as well as appealing to religion (something the founding fathers would be against certainly) and starting a million wars in the Middle East, which the Founding Fathers only ever did once and it ended in a treaty that said the US is not a Christian nation.
All of this is even more ironic because I know that our resident Cherokee Princess never reads nor responds to my posts because she got to the first line of one of them and blocked me.