For instance, did you know that you could theoretically be persecuted and exterminated large-scale on the basis of your economic class or political affiliation and it wouldn't legally count as genocide? That's because, under the Genocide Convention (1948), genocide is typified by the "intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group." Instead, any large-scale campaigns of extermination against groups not covered by the Convention would result in, at best, charges of persecution and mass murder, but not genocide.
No one said it was good, people only stated a fact that this is a justified action. Of course morally it is a mass-murder no less, but then what would you think would define a "combatant", the one who holds the gun and shoot you or the one who will shoot you later when you're busying dealing with "civilians"? If you're staying with an enemy, that makes you the supporter of said enemy. If you're not a combatant but choose to stay in a combat zone, that makes you a combatant by default.this is my first time going to the comments section for this manga but im really supprised by the amount of people who think that 203's mass murder of "combatants" was good. no. that shit isnt good.
it doesnt matter on the technicality, its mass murder of civilians disgused as deaths of war. Tanya literally said to being x that atrocities were going to be committed.
it was very much implied in about 30% of comments. i could practically hear them yelling “HELL YEAH, BURN EM UP”.No one said it was good, people only stated a fact that this is a justified action. Of course morally it is a mass-murder no less, but then what would you think would define a "combatant", the one who holds the gun and shoot you or the one who will shoot you later when you're busying dealing with "civilians"? If you're staying with an enemy, that makes you the supporter of said enemy. If you're not a combatant but choose to stay in a combat zone, that makes you a combatant by default.
If you've read the manga carefully, author really stressed the line "In a war, you either kill or get killed
Dont start a fucking war just because you were jealous of how much more successful your neighbor was then.Whatever you guys said @WhimsiCat, @KitsuVonKraft, shit is still WRONG, stop trying to justify mass murder.
When did i advocate for war?Dont start a fucking war just because you were jealous of how much more successful your neighbor was then.
By defending the ones who started it from the ones trying to end it as efficiently as possible.When did i advocate for war?
By defending the ones who started it from the ones trying to end it as efficiently as possible.
German efficiency is when you do war crime /sHey that guy beat me up, I'm justified when I murdered him, mutilated his corpse, strung him up for the whole town to see, burned down his whole neighborhood and then nuked the whole planet so that no one can ever hurt me again.
Meanwhile you conveniently ignore all the Empire PoWs and civilians that the frenchie militia executed in cold blood 😮💨.German efficiency is when you do war crime /s
Ah, whataboutism, niceMeanwhile you conveniently ignore all the Empire PoWs and civilians that the frenchie militia executed in cold blood 😮💨.
You do understand that thats nowhere near the same as just getting beaten up?
Yeah, whataboutism in how you compared an unprompted and unwarranted declaration of war to just getting beaten up. Glad you manned up and noticed your own mistake there.Ah, whataboutism, nice