Well, while some people will say "Feminism in Action", I have to say, these people don't understand history. Be it in Ancient times, or Medieval times, there were women rulers. Cleopatra, Queen Elizabeth, Bloody Mary, Queen Isabela, Catherine the Great, and others. Women weren't as discriminated against in the past as everybody thinks. The thing is if you were a queen, and married some noble, you didn't lose your right to rule, after all, you have the royal blood, and your husband doesn't. But you could lead the same luxurious life without working, or getting crazy solving the country's problems, leading wars, being on diplomatic missions, etc. Well, most women who took the throne, prefer to leave this to their husbands. But as I pointed out, not everybody was like that, some of them wanted the power struggle, wanted to lead wars, and solve the nation's problems, and that wasn't viewed as something bad. As the king here says, he didn't want her to have the burden of the crown (because she was fragile and everything) and had to choose her husband to take it away from her. There were worse ways of writing it, so I'm pleased that the author didn't go the feminazy style and had her father forbidden her from taking the throne.