Characters making moral judgements that make absolutely no sense in the given context of the situation. Two examples, Nut Master and (I believe) Isekai Munchkin or something I don't remember.
In Nut Master there is a plot involving a father and daughter over how their weapon creation skills should be handled. This is because someone they both loved and cared about was killed using their weapons. Daughter takes it upon herself to be the moral authority and say the dad is terrible because he refuses to stop making weapons and how he's spitting on that persons name or some crap. The thing about this is that the Dad knew that person far longer than the daughter, since his childhood in fact.
The series does not take one moment to point out how ridiculous it is for her to make such an accusation to him, knowing full well that the man had to continue to provide for her as a parent with the means he had available and the constant reminder of loss created by his own hands. Then he has to deal with his daughter hating him and then he has to keep his men employed so THEIR families won't go hungry. This man is so clearly weighed down by the entire ordeal that you could probably figure that such a situation would lead most people to break down... but not a single word of dialogue is uttered to sympathize with him. All of the sympathy goes to the daughter! Boo hoo me, Boo hoo my feelings, Boo hoo my troubles. My dad is dumb, Boo hoo! She eventually changes her mind on weapon creation (obviously) but never really comes to the realization of what she's been saying and doing to her dad.
I sat there so stunned that I was kind of in awe.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In munchkin it's a similar situation. Village Chief is under immense pressure and threat of his entire village being destroyed and he has sacrifice people, which he himself hates. This isn't one of those situations where they THINK they have to, he outright must or they all die because there are no better options. Later MC then goes on to say that the book, which informs him of moral alignments, doesn't inform him of people's full character.
...Except so far that's exactly what it's been doing. The last guy the book said was "Good" was a good person. He hated injustice and evil. YOU oh dear MC are the guy who is radiating energy from what's tantamount to literal satan, so it isn't a far reaching conclusion that you are either one or both of these things. Hell, no one who knows anything about the deity whose presence is all over you is gonna let you go without trying to kill you because 10 times out of 10 the followers are vile, terrible, immoral monsters whose only goal is to cause suffering, chaos and death. You can't say people aren't being perfectly described when YOU are the odd one out in the scenario.
Even with the old man he tries to play like he knows better... until he comes face to face with the reason the chief did what he did. They ALL get mopped by this thing trying to fight it and end up running off. The village is then destroyed because the MC caused them to fail to meet the requirements of staying alive.
That man was a good person, he sought to help people no matter who they were and when push came to shove he made the choice to keep his people alive. He didn't like the choice, wasn't happy with it, but he loved his people and he's their leader and their protector. It's often easy to forget that when you're a leader these are choices you have to make.
It's the kill 10 to save 1000 or kill 1000 to save 10 scenario. It's not meant to be a reflection of morality, it's meant to ask if you could handle a decision where there is no "clean" answer.
That man could have simply killed himself or done something stupid like try to run or attempt to move the village because those were the easier options. But that would've gotten his people chased and killed because, big shocker, evil deity talks directly to and guides the thing that's forcing them to sacrifice people. Even if we assume that they could hide, moving an entire village full of children and immigrants isn't exactly subtle or easy. You would most definitely be found within a week and you'd all die.
So what do you do? Can't run. Can't hide. Can't fight. Can't call for help (as if anyone would take it). You either kill innocent people or EVERYONE (the innocents included) dies.
He was a good man in a bad situation with only worse options but apparently this sequence of events causes the MC to question everything about morality as if the MC could have thought of a better way, had he been in their shoes.
I get that the story is playing with the D&D morality system, but these two situations were not the scenarios to pick when trying to make the point that alignments are unreliable. I dropped it immediately after that chapter.