You sure?
Here, this is you saying "i dont need argument cose i'm smarter than everyone else".
Bro just be quiet. I literally did not say "i dont need argument cose i'm smarter than everyone else," so good job misquoting me like that. You continue to prove that you don't know how to argue properly with someone (not to mention all your rampant grammar and spelling issues).
This is a claim, but no argument nor proof.
You are delusional. If you can't see the flaws in your own logic, you are hopeless.
This is a claim, that's false. and no argument since everything prove that poor people have more kid than rich people.
Look at
this.
According to this the cost to raise a SINGLE child is about $300,000. Impoverished people have children irresponsibility knowing they cannot properly provide for their offspring. What it states
here corroborate this, where it also states how expensive having kids can be (see? I actually have evidence for the things I say. Even though it should be obvious).
And if you want even MORE evidence for my claim that having children is financially costly well
here and
here.
Look another claim where you say someone else is wrong because you're too emotional to talk like a normal adult.
This is a claim, and i dont see any argument nor proof, just some childish personal attack like in every single of your post.
This is yet another claim backed by only you belief as it's proved that human cant control their instinct,
Have you ever heard of Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs? Probably not given your sheer ignorance. Here's more evidence coming your way since you seem to think I don't have any:
https://www.simplypsychology.org/maslow.html
If you look at the hierarchy you'll see that yes reproduction is the most basic of our human needs instinctually. BUT it isn't the ONLY thing that drives us. There are four other levels to the hierarchy that humans aim to achieve. Not to mention humans are capable of self reflection and self awareness (oh do I need evidence for something THIS obvious too? Well
here you go). And that wouldn't be possible if humans were purely just slaves to their instincts like YOU claim (and with no evidence).
science already proved that the claim people make about their "free will" is just a belief and human are just reacting to the world only based on their experiance, like very single other animals.
Actualy you just need to look at western people fucking like rabbit, and watching porn all year long to understand how wrong this claim is.
Science? What science? Present evidence of this claim. Just saying "because science said so" is not evidence fool.
And so what? A lot of people fuck and/or watch porn. How does that refute my claim that "we're civilized, intelligent humans not animals living in the wild. We have more than a singular desire to "perpetuate our species." Are you saying people who fuck and/or watch porn are not intelligent or civilized? That they don't desire more from their lives? Maslow's Hierarchy supports my claim.
This is just an emotional take that twist the word of someone, not based on anything that was said previously.
What are you talking about? YOU said, and I quote, "LGB whatevers." I'm not twisting your words or misquoting you like you've done with other commenters. Or are you going to deny that you said "LGB whatevers"? And at the time mentioning this was relevant.
This is you using "subjunctive" with nothing backing your claim saying this person was wrong.
And dont "but you dont give any proof either", when i came into this discution you where already making baseless claim acting as if your belief was the truth. Everyone know that people like you are ignorant and will refute reality even when it's proven.
Just look at how you dodged all the counter argument given to you.
...oh my god. DO I NEED EVIDENCE TO SAY "NOT EVERY PERSON ON THE PLANET IS A MURDERER?" IT'S OBVIOUS!
It should be a given that not ALL families are like yours or have identical circumstances. My family isn't like yours, my friend's family isn't like yours. Therefore you're entire claim is false because there exists at least one exception to the rule.
All your "counter-arguments" are made with no presented evidence. Truth be told, they're not even real arguments because there's nothing supporting them.
So now I turn to you: where is your hard evidence? Or will you continue to be "ignorant and will refute reality even when it's proven." And trust me when I say "hard evidence" that means you can give me a reputable source that supports your claims. Because if you can't then you have proven beyond a doubt that you are ignorant and uneducated, all in an attempt to push your biased, uninformed opinions as undeniable fact.
