Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- May 31, 2018
- Messages
- 1,119
@TheOneWhoSighs You seem to think of things highly one sided.
As Sleeper said, if a group decides to pull out from MD, it's on them to explain why. They were ones that made that decision, therefore if any MD staff asked about the reasons, it's completely logical to redirect them to the ones that actually made the decision. After a group pulls out and terminate the relationship, they have no obligation to keep their back for them. The same applies to an announcment when a group leaves. Why should MD staff make that one? Let the ones that actually leaves make it, it's their "job" to explain, as they made the decision. The fact that MD was willing to mass nuke the releases of groups that left were already a nice thing from them, because they had no obligations to do that either. If a group uploads something, a group should remove. Yet they felt entitled to that, and it looked like: I hate you, but do this favor for me so I can avoid inconvinience.
As for the irrational part, it was the case. JB refused to have a presence here, on a site, which offered a quick acces to JB website and discord, also crediting them for what they do, while their works got copied by every shitty aggregator out there, either with removing their credit page or not. You think JB and the other groups that used the delay option had no traffic redirected to them from here? They had. Most of the readers never heard or cared about scan groups until they had a presence on MD. Also let me remind you that MD already bent over to JB with the extension of the delay option.
As Sleeper said, if a group decides to pull out from MD, it's on them to explain why. They were ones that made that decision, therefore if any MD staff asked about the reasons, it's completely logical to redirect them to the ones that actually made the decision. After a group pulls out and terminate the relationship, they have no obligation to keep their back for them. The same applies to an announcment when a group leaves. Why should MD staff make that one? Let the ones that actually leaves make it, it's their "job" to explain, as they made the decision. The fact that MD was willing to mass nuke the releases of groups that left were already a nice thing from them, because they had no obligations to do that either. If a group uploads something, a group should remove. Yet they felt entitled to that, and it looked like: I hate you, but do this favor for me so I can avoid inconvinience.
As for the irrational part, it was the case. JB refused to have a presence here, on a site, which offered a quick acces to JB website and discord, also crediting them for what they do, while their works got copied by every shitty aggregator out there, either with removing their credit page or not. You think JB and the other groups that used the delay option had no traffic redirected to them from here? They had. Most of the readers never heard or cared about scan groups until they had a presence on MD. Also let me remind you that MD already bent over to JB with the extension of the delay option.