@DLRevan @Grikath @blacksaber79 I'll give you 3 some time to read the site rules from
https://mangadex.org/rules before you go into an argument regarding it
We have read it. We know it. That's the whole point.
3.2.1.
Do not arbitrarily combine several chapters into a single release.
If there's any ambiguity about this, it's as sub-chapters. However if you're going to be pedantic about this, then the rule should be clearer, that's not our problem. Furthermore the source released it separately as well. "Sub-chapters" is just a label.
3.2.2.
Chapters may only be split into parts if the source material was also split in the same way. Chapters that have been split up by the scanlators for any other reason may be recombined into singular whole chapters.
By implication and in order to not contradict the first rule, this also means nobody should recombine content where the source was also split, into "whole" chapters.
3.4.6.
Use decimals (1.1, 1.5, etc.) for chapters that are split into parts, or for bonus chapters/volume extras/etc.
This rule further acknowledges the issue of sub-chapters and by implication accepts that some manga are structured this way.
And if I want to be especially cheeky,
4.2.
MangaDex does not condone contacting groups about changing their restrictions or uploading their releases. If you are contacting a group, be polite, and make it clear you are not associated with MangaDex.
Even if this rule seems to imply private communications, the spirit of it should stand. We're not here to criticize or hound groups about their practices or releasing sooner. The original poster of that sparked this issue also was anything but "polite". Ultimately this is not just about your uploading rules, but about how a group chooses to release. The guy was being an entitled troll. Do you dispute that? I think many here would disagree.
Every day there are folk who attack groups for exactly this type of issue, and groups are caught between your rules, the readers demands, and their own circumstances. You could do better than to just tell us to read the rules and vaguely imply we did something wrong, but maybe you don't have the time. I personally think you don't have the time given the volume of such casually rampant comments, this forum isn't the cleanest, so get off our backs when we have at people like this.
And yes I'm typing this here in public because if there's something you don't agree on these points or my stance, I think everyone here should be made aware of that. So what did you mean, other than to mic-drop us the site rules link?