Trust is a two way street. It requires both parties to understand the situation between each other. Being able to convey your situation to someone you're relying on doesn't require you to be infallible, but it does help your case when taking another person's time, resources and effort.Yeah, I agree, we really do have very different ideas, because what you are saying friend... is an infallible person who does not exist.
I am not saying there are not people that are straight to the point, there are, but people are not simple definitions of actions... they are emotions, feelings and opinions.
People can be direct and straight in many situations, but when things get closer to their hearts, they start to make "mistakes"... they see things not just with objectivity but with expectation, desires, and regrets... and there are a lot of those in this here, even if I think is very "gently" done is still very personal.
I should correct myself and say that I agree that she is taking advantage of him... to a certain extent... but he has laid a boundary, however so subtle.
The thing with this story is the journey to whatever is in their new future, they may rekindle their relationship, they may find a new friendship, or they may part ways again, and those will have all the expectations, desires, and regrets just as much as the emotions, feelings, and opinions.
But what there is now... is not deserving of the vitriol I have seen in past chapters.
Well, I respect your opinion, even if I disagree with the core of it I can too recognize that there are parts you are right about or at least I can't make a counterpoint.Trust is a two way street. It requires both parties to understand the situation between each other. Being able to convey your situation to someone you're relying on doesn't require you to be infallible, but it does help your case when taking another person's time, resources and effort.
Yes, emotions and feelings are important, but you need to also make the other person understand why you're depending on them. Just focusing on your own emotions without being considerate of the other party's external emotions doesn't justify one's actions.
I'm well aware of the boundary he laid out, but it just seems like she's trying to test the boundary on how far she could take advantage of him. Yes, I agree with you to an extent.
I agree that both sides are taking it too far, but I think that some vitriol is warranted.
Not around for the Tsumiki vampire incident, huh. People lost their damn minds over absolutely nothing.I don't think I've ever seen a manga even the popular ones get 3 straight 200+ comments lmfao
ApparentlyShe definitely no longer married. Last chapter has her daughter believe her mom is enjoying life because of MC and she isn't jealous nor mentioning her papa. And this one we have the mom being a bit flirty with MC. Seems like a good sign the mom is single now.
Joke on you I already move on to succ-chan for ntr/bss/steal your friend crush kino.Not around for the Tsumiki vampire incident, huh. People lost their damn minds over absolutely nothing.
I guess technically ch4 only got like 177 comments, but ch3 getting almost 400 makes up for it.
While I am at that point where I do agree that this is probably just going to devolve into a nifty little SoL with a family atmosphere, my problem is the groundwork laid out. It's a premise that leaves a reader to want explanations, because we as readers when given a slice of life story are very likely to insert ourselves into the perspective of the main character. Sure, you could argue or that Takaharu is just not prying because he figures it's something that Kyou wouldn't want to touch on and that Kyou is also not saying anything because she doesn't want to talk about it, but is that not just a cop-out? Am I supposed to do all of that assuming when Kyou just seems incredibly carefree and Takaharu seems... complacent?I find it strange how people clearly read the synopses and saw this is a SoL with a cute art style... and still are going hard on the vitriol.
It's probably gonna drop further, or stay around that, until the story actually gives some answers, instead of just producting new questions 🥲6.9 for this is so insane man😂😂, it's not that deep guys
Yeah the Taiga archetype is definitely a no go in this era. I tried rewatching Fruit's Basket when they remade it some years ago and I was like "holy shit, how did I not recognize how fucked up the boar-girl character is?" I don't think it's just rosy-glasses that keep me liking Tora-Dora though. I rewatched it again less than a year ago and still really enjoyed it.Taiga will not survive in this era where most people already move on from violent tsundere heroine.
I think it's because of her children. It has been ingrained in our generation(reader) that children are considered huge burden(which is true), when this combine with her circumstance of her coming back to him result in the severity of her issues multiply by a lot.
Good for her for having mc as her ex tho. I think if I were mc I will demand full explanation of her circumstance before I let her stay for an extensive period of time.