No. You just make some baseless assumptions about what the author wanted, convince yourself they are true and then get angry at them. Stop tilting at windmills.all of those sh*ts above are artificial constructs to convey a message and prove a point. it's because i noticed all that that i got so freaking annoyed with this manga.
because everything felt so intentional & constructed. too transparent & too blatant. it's like the author is openly preaching his ideals in an agora. just like socrates, plato & aristotle. pfft!
so, instead of empathizing with the characters & the story, you should see this story as an attempt to enlighten you, to criticize you, or maybe even to mock you.
What are you even talking about? Of course authors write chapters first, and only then come up with names for those.also, take a look at some of the chapter titles, e.g. "worst morning in history" & "gloomy, doomy". i mean it's quite obvious that those titles were written in retrospect
bro, let's just agree to disagree here. i've read enough stuff to warrant all my tilting at windmills. even if it was cervantes's real intention, do you honestly prefer quijano to quixote? how dull. i'm actually honoring the author by giving his story a serious reading here.No. You just make some baseless assumptions about what the author wanted, convince yourself they are true and then get angry at them. Stop tilting at windmills.
What are you even talking about? Of course authors write chapters first, and only then come up with names for those.
Pretty much my thoughts on this series.i really need to blow off some steam and you, potential readers, better pay attention.
if the author is a clueless, socially inept, pretentious prick, he'd definitely end this story with a happy ending. yuu could end up with either one or with no one but the ending would definitely be positive.
his main idea would be: a story that tells the readers to accept both the joy and the abyss. pretty much a mahler 4. pfft! as if!
probably he thought that it's avant garde to mix two genres in the same story. hence, the two archetypical female protagonists along with the typical plots, tropes & vibes that accompany them. in high contrast.
we could extend the idea above to the author preaching: "the readers shouldn't stick to one genre because life ain't that way. stop enjoying your comfort zone. you don't have the right to dwell in any escapism of your own choice.".
but, this ain't a mahler 4 that tells the paradox of an elusive, childishly innocent, heavenly life and the abysmal dark nebulas just around the corner.
this is simply the world through the lens of an edgy pretentious japanese dude. why? because life itself ain't as black and white as what he'd told us through his story.
his characters are archetypes that he used as vehicles to deliver his message to us. hence, we got the dark character with her assortment of bad luck and the light character with all her sunshines & rainbows. do take note that these archetypes are archetypes in fictions, not in real life.
i mean, just think: what are the odds that things in this story truly happen to a character, let alone to a real person? have you met real japanese dudes or girls? they certainly ain't yuu, yami, or hikari. like, seriously.
just go to grad school in good universities in japan, e.g. kyodai, todai, hokudai, waseda, etc., you'll see real sheltered urban young japanese people there.
some are timid/awkward, while some others are pretentious as f*ck. most are generally good natured, though some can be quite ignorant to worldviews outside their own culture. well.. typical homogeneous society.
hence, this story is 100% engineered/designed.
bruh, the set up was quite obvious. i was not pissed because i felt like i got stabbed out of nowhere. i felt pissed because i actually could see the intent and the set up. i simply think that it's freaking patronizing, pretentious, arrogant but naive & clueless at the same time.
just take a look at the title. also, take a look at some of the chapter titles, e.g. "worst morning in history" & "gloomy, doomy". i mean it's quite obvious that those titles were written in retrospect. also, the tone of some of the drawings have some hints of darkness in hikari's chapters.
those are the clues, foreshadowing, or whatever.
the uber cheery hikari is one of the setup. also, yami's background stories & details that are just way too much & way too textbook. plus, the fact that yuu had changed after meeting yami and then as a consequence hikari suddenly got interested in yuu.
after hikari's & yami's, there's a high probability that we will get yuu's chapters later on. chapters that would justify him, yami & the plot. perhaps we would also get some "negative" details on hikari that could balance the situation later.
all of those sh*ts above are artificial constructs to convey a message and prove a point. it's because i noticed all that that i got so freaking annoyed with this manga.
because everything felt so intentional & constructed. too transparent & too blatant. it's like the author is openly preaching his ideals in an agora. just like socrates, plato & aristotle. pfft!
so, instead of empathizing with the characters & the story, you should see this story as an attempt to enlighten you, to criticize you, or maybe even to mock you.
he's not trying to give you a show (a morning k-drama or a sh*tty generic j-dorama). he's trying to invade you with his ideals.
knowing all that, you should judge the author and his story through the message that he wants to tell and through his execution of it. is his message truly that original? not really. is it well executed? i don't think so.
the messages in frieren can be quite naive & too optimistic sometimes but there's certainly a reason why frieren is so well regarded despite the blatant moralizing & preaching.
i could easily end this story in an idealistic japanese dude kind of way: turbulent storms followed by angst & melodramas, slow burn reconciliations, do-over friendships & relationships while still acknowledging everything that has happened, all characters become ubermensch, happy ending! pfft.
but, seriously, trust me that if this manga & the novel wouldn't get cancelled, there's a high probability that the plot would be a melodrama about overcoming all the sh*ts that had happened in order to reach that "ideal" happy ending.
also, f*ck the yuri baiting. this is one of the reasons why you can't simply mix two genres. you can't have romcom tropes, e.g. the semi-ecchi joke, the fluff & the mild yuri baiting, if you want this story to be taken seriously. this is one of the reasons why i truly loathe this manga.
you want to preach & deliver some serious stuff and yet you still decide to include all those banal romcom tropes. what f*cking a joke.
to be completely honest, what really irks me is the fact that i could just "torture" myself with re-reading war & peace or re-watching the human condition if i want some good preaching.
it really annoys me that this stuff is being sold as a commercial product. now i really want to see their sales forecast & reports. i also want to see the proposal that the author/editor gave to their superiors.
judging by the number of likes/favorites in the original source's website, it certainly fills a niche. though that small niche is dropping from 300+ to 200+. lately it's in the 100-200 range. if it goes to below 100 later then this story is certainly a bad business decision.
from now on, i really should just stick with "pure entertainment" when it comes to manga & anime. after reading, watching & knowing more stuff in life, my patience for edgy & patronizing authors is practically nonexistent.
i truly adore eva & lain and yet i can't endure this sh*tty manga lol
Mate, I don't think even the concept of disagreement applies here. You just made up stuff about author's intentions, there is no way to prove something doesn't exist, especially when it's made-up.bro, let's just agree to disagree here.
Still not following you here. What's wrong with Hikari figuratively calling that chapter "the worst morning in history" then? She was clearly unhappy with her own behavior and that's why she called it the worst, so what does that signify in your view?oh, when i said in retrospect, i meant: written by the character in retrospect, not the author. from the character's perspective, not the author's.
that's exactly why most soap operas are garbage, don't you think?Mate, I don't think even the concept of disagreement applies here. You just made up stuff about author's intentions, there is no way to prove something doesn't exist, especially when it's made-up.
The only thing I can say is, this is just a rom(com?) with a love triangle. It's a pretty simple genre, you know? It's not where you insert some moral teachings and lessons, it's just a way to explore characters, show their highs and lows, put them in some heartwarming and heartrending situations.
And thankfully, here the author isn't afraid to put characters through actual hardships, doesn't hesitate to hurt them or show their negative sides. It's funny to see complaints about bad story from people who are reading stuff like Ao no Hako or Anjou-san, where everything is as safe as possible. Where the whole drama revolves around misunderstandings, which the reader already knows about, where you can't even imagine any negative consequences or actual conflicts. Where everything is clearly predetermined, every character who was obviously written to "win" is gonna win, and losers will lose in a graceful manner.
And don't get me wrong, this story is far from perfect or complex. But most people complaining about it can't even formulate what's bad about it, they just repeat the same formulaic "criticism" like "bad writing", "bad pacing", "edgy" etc.
Still not following you here. What's wrong with Hikari figuratively calling that chapter "the worst morning in history" then? She was clearly unhappy with her own behavior and that's why she called it the worst, so what does that signify in your view?
So far yes, it is.do you honestly think that this story is a good love triangle?
What double meanings? But I guess it's just another assumption which you use as a jab at the author.the "gloomy, doomy" and the "worst morning in history" are basically just like the "it's too late" in the manga title. they're simply cheeky puns from the author. they most likely have double meanings.
I don't even know where to start.you could feel that it's 100% engineered/designed with certain preconceived objectives in mind. the pitting between light vs. dark and the "thrill" are obviously some of them.
The flashback is where the readers learn about Yami's past relationship with Yuu and learn more about them. I don't see any suspense in this, it's just introducing another character and giving them depth. There is nothing to "justify" either.the flashback arc afther the "thrill" is basically where the readers should feel the "suspense" while learning more details about yami and things that justify her character.
I don't think there is any yuri baiting.also, do you really think the latest yuri baiting is necessary?
Yes, and? People (especially young people) need much less than a month to become good friends if they enjoy talking to each other.some people have mentioned it already: they only knew each other for about a month.
It is implied in the title, what did you expect "is too late" to mean?Dropped it after 21. Wanted wholesome romance, got nonsense instead.
If you're gonna go the drama route, at least hint towards it or make it believable. Bait & switching with cheap writing for shock is lame