It's obvious by how he was talking about brothels and having sex with Kuroko.
He talked about going to brothels wtih Yumezora after she asked him. How is that evidence that he never loved her or wanted to marry her? The fact he's willing to share such embarrassing details merely shows that he is naive and socially inexperienced about things like propriety.
I think he cares for her but he doesn't LOVE her.
Your earlier claim was "all he wanted was someone to fuck"
https://forums.mangadex.org/threads/ori-no-naka-ch-28-deeper-darker.2434120/post-27806140
The claims "Gomi cares about yumezora" and "all gomi wants is someone to fuck" seem to be in quite a lot of tension.
If he did love her then he would be there for her like not having sex and talking things out with her.
He attempted to do that and she declined
He admitted he confuses
love and
lust.
This happened after Yumezora turned down Gomi's sincere declaration of love and revealed she was married and just wants a sex arrangement, so the fact that he feels unsure in this moment about whether he loves Yumezora , after she turned him down and admitted she only wants him for sex, doesn't actually say anything about whether he never loved Yumezora. As far as we know he sincerely loved yumezora and had every intention to marry her at the time he declared his love for her.
Furthermore, it's actually pretty common for members of married couples to at some point have asked themselves " Do I love this person? " especially when getting to know that person.
It's not like if you ever feel doubt even once then that means you don't love that person. By that standard a huge fraction of loving marriages would have to be classified as one partner not loving the other.
And you're leaving out the fact that even after this moment of doubt and thinking "do I just want sexual gratification?" he returns to the realisation that he loves Yumezora. It's clear by the way he draws her on page 5 compared with the ugly depictions on earlier pages. The earlier pages depict cheap, nasty lust and sex with hookers which juxaposes the beauty he depicts Yumezora. He sees Yumezora as far more beautiful because he sincerely wants to spend the rest of his life with her (sincerely desiring to spend your life together as man and wife = love). It's a visual representation of "having eyes for her only" showing that still what he wants is to marry and settle down with her.
And then at the end of the chapter he still says to her that he wants her to leave her husband and be with him instead, showing that's what he most desires not just sex.
So the pages of him doubting whether he loves Yumezora after she rejected him and told him she was married don't show that he didn't love her before, and even after that they aren't strong evidence since feelings of doubt at some point are common among couples who fall in love and the answer he settles on after questioning himself is that he loves Yumezora.
Yes and those who came back from war often have PTSD and have high divorce rates. Why? They haven't talked to their spouses about what happened in the war. Plus, they had therapy. Sadly, Japan is known for looking down on those who see a psychologist.
Those things are irrelevant. You claimed "love is about seeing a person at their worst and still wanting to be with them"
https://forums.mangadex.org/threads/ori-no-naka-ch-28-deeper-darker.2434120/post-27807349
but many loving couples will never see their spouse at their worst because their spouse was at their worst before they met their spouse which shows that seeing someone at their worst is not a requirement to be in love with someone. One obvious example of this is men who return from war then meet women and get married. For many of those men they were at their worst during the war and their wife never saw that.
If you want to refute this example which shows that seeing someone at their worst is not a requirement to love them, then you need to either show that none of those marriages constituted love or that for all of those marriages the man was actually at his worst after returning from the war (or going through some other great improvement).
When loving someone, they know your past and what you did and still decide to love you.
Knowing about someone's previous struggles is different from seeing them at their worst.
Also, the same basic argument applies. There are many married couples where one of the spouses went through great struggle before meeting their spouse and they never went into great detail about their previous struggle. For example soldiers returning from war who don't talk in great detail to their wife about what they did and saw there. Yet many of those marriages are still loving, so it's not a requirement for loving someone that you need to know all about your past struggles when you were at your worst.
Yes, because he was caught. He didn't do it from the bottom of his heart. He only said sorry when it evidence was shown
Now you're just shifting the goalposts. Your previous claim was :
"This is a dude who was sniffing out her pads. Not once did he say sorry for doing that."
https://forums.mangadex.org/threads/ori-no-naka-ch-28-deeper-darker.2434120/post-27807349
When you don't admit that your original claim was flat out wrong , that's being dishonest. Can you admit that your original claim was wrong?