I mostly don't care, I mostly make fun of authors in a meta way, when they flup up in my eyes or for some of their readership, so this is just a summary of the discussion:
It's not about morals, it's about one-trick ponies/repetition and the weird pacing of showing non-consensual humping to death for an already irredeemable and established villain.
Also some people don't relish in negative reinforcement. Others get hyped by it, to see the villain beaten: "Jetzt erst recht! Especially (justified) now!"...
So yeah, this is not about moral grandstanding as far as I can see, "the author shouldn't write/draw this! It's wrong!". So unless you can point me to where that came up, I guess you kinda missed the point.
Let me join the fun since you atleast have something to say,
"I mostly don't care, I mostly make fun of authors in a meta way, when they flup up in my eyes or for some of their readership, so this is just a summary of the discussion:"
well you still need a solid argument for that, calling it over the top when it's Violence been persistence in the series and way worse happened in the series on top of something like this are not out of realm of possibilites since it's actually happened in real world.
so factually you can't call it over the top, factually if someone say it's about moral grandstanding someone can make that claim, and factually i can make fun of you for being wrong.
"already irredeemable and established villain."
hmmm you fell asleep multiple times in this series ? just my guess.
"Also some people don't relish in negative reinforcement. Others get hyped by it"
and some people make up bullshit out of thin air somehow because they just don't like it, curious.
"the author shouldn't write/draw this! It's wrong"
the language so have been like this, you wanna me quote several few ? but you are big boy enough so just scroll up and look up yourself.
"Complaining about writing styles or edginess is not moral grandstanding."
sure, but you've been proven wrong. so what is this then ? this "feeling" of yours ? care to explain ?
"Nobody called for the author to never write about SA and co again, nor implied that this part was morally wrong to write."
just don't do both, because it'll be 'over the top' amirite or amirite ?
"point. Or maybe you're misunderstanding moral grandstanding... I dunno"
i dunno, did you ?
"I'm also not attacking you or your points directly, I'm just trying to clear up a misunderstanding on terminology or something like that."
i'm also not attacking you personally, please don't be that other guy suddenly talking about my "tone" being a mean booboo when he never mentioned it until i cornered him lmao.
you seems pretty level headed, so just answer me honestly