@Korvalus,
@ShinGetsu,
@Rugid,
@sunshinelemons: See below for your answers
@iskaeil
It's about practicing, though.
Yeah, you don't really practice if you're getting thrown into cold water. For actually good results a controlled environment is crucial. Speed comes from precision after all.
If she had tried attempted to speak at least once, I'd be happy.
We know that Connie is a shy, honest and nice person and not used to talking back. Those persons have it especially hard if they are getting bombarded by another person. They don't want to be rude and "they have to stop at some point, right?"
Like, just a simple "hold on!" or "excuse me--!" is acceptable, no?
That would work, in theory. Most of the time they stop, wait a heartbeat and if you haven't said anything start from the beginning and leave you no room to breathe. That's their whole shtick, overload the other persons brain so it makes associations and then they lead you into the path they want you to be by leading the questions (that's the main reason why leading questions are forbidden in most courts; people tend to follow them).
What's that commoner going to do, check her alibi and write a story about how she was brushed off?
No, they start gossip and rumours, even if they are blatant lies. If the newspaper/journal they publish in is at least somewhat know, people will believe it (good real life examples are the Diana/Charles situation and boulevard press in general) and they start to talk. Now if a certain noble from a previous chapter wants to get back to Connie but can't do it directly, because they are protected by another noble, they just have the perfect setup.
Just "accidentally" see your servants reading the paper and then drop some remarks, you can be sure those get onto the street. W.T. Sherman put it in some nice words:
If I had my choice, I would kill every reporter in the world, but I am sure we would be getting reports from hell before breakfast.
I get your standpoint, but Connie speaking up (at least at this point in time) isn't supported by the story.
@Korvalus
The reporter is playing with fire with those kind of sensationalist articles.
This has never stopped the media. Diana/Charles comes to mind and even more crass: The Franco-Prussian war of 1871 began because the French media translated a German officials rank wrong. They used
adjutant, which in French described a low ranking NCO, in German however a high ranking officer, and correctly translated with
aide de camp. Naturally a count brushed off by an NCO didn't sit well with the Frenc populace and... queue the drums of war.
@ShinGetsu
And the second was basically a modern SJW.
Not quite. I know the term SJW is used pretty derogatory in certain circles and that women doesn't even fit the bill. Also, such behaviour is older than feudalism, just with different topics.
Moral Guardian fits the bill much better, especially if you take her remarks about Connie trying to imitate Scarlett (clearly taken from the newspaper report) are taken into account.
@Rugid
a countess really, now that she's engaged, and possible future duchess
That's not how the peerage system works... Depending on the country the wife of a peer may hold the title by law but isn't stylized as one (i.e. the source of the title is still the husband and the wife looses it as soon as the marriage ends) as it is done in the UK, or the wife doesn't even get the title by law, but only as a courtesy title (old German nobility).
No matter the system, however, she doesn't get the title until the marriage is consummated, i.e. vows have been exchanged
and intercourse has happened.
@sunshinelemons
I think the author did really poorly by making Kimberly look rich as she does.
I don't think that's quite the case. You assume that she's a rich merchants wife and I'd concur with that. From what I have read and the personal history of my family (which would have been classified as "bourgeoisie" in the 19th century, given we owned multiple factories), this kind of people had the money to clad themselves as good, or even better than aristocracy.
Here in Germany the term "money aristocracy" was never used in a positive light, especially when said by "real" aristocracy.
So I wouldn't say she "pretends to be a noble", but rather: She has the money and she wants people to know that she has; which was common in that period of time. Not showing your wealth is really something that really came after the protests of 1968.