i did not do that and screw you for implying that i did.if you’re defending pedophilia and rape
The issue is this wasn't played for wacky, this was played straight. This was a pretty real issues chapter. And it didn't need to be an adult doing the hands-on instruction.i mean, in the context of the real world, yes, that's 100% what that was
but in the utterly bonkers world that the characters in this manga inhabit, i don't think it's as clear-cut as that
believe me, im 110% against sexual liations between teacher and student, im a high school teacher myself
but the world that mocchi au lait has created in this manga has many weird things being glossed over like nothing happened
the main cast are fresh from a Battle Royale scenario where the outcome would decide whether Toudou-san will be sold into sex slavery or not
but the main cast are cool with that now, it hasn't really even been mentioned
in a realistic manga, a sexual assault such as was presented in this chapter could be the focus of an entire story arc
in this one, it will likely leave no lasting impressions other than to give sporty spice a sexual outlet
TL;DR its just a gag manga
Man you really are a nightmare weeb huhSo, by your own logic, you are here consuming child pornography and rape media, gotcha. That’s a totally reasonable take and makes 100% sense, Mr. Sane Person.
Or maybe what happens in the manga doesn’t matter at all, just a guess.
That's a very specific interpretation of her being a benevolent nurse who's also a klutz who does not know how to behave around minors. Not saying you're wrong, future chapters may prove your right, but so far, there was no detail given supporting this theory. No detail at all, in factShe just so happened to offer some very direct help to a student who wanted some guidance.
She's a yakuza princess. Yakuza stereotypically are all about submission powerplays, outward sadism and homoeroticism. The first chapter she was introduced in makes her personality clear, then there's a volume-worth of chapters dedicated to fleshing out her character, but even without that, a stereotype is a good starting point. As opposed to that, I have not heard of of nurses being stereotypical child molesterstake Banryuu for instance
In abscence of any exploration, the speculations might be less about in-manga fanfictions and more about questioning the author's intent. For example, my speculations are a) The author is completely out of touch about what is an approprite way for adults to act around kids b) It was supposed to be a joke which fell flat on its vagina c) The author was in hentai-writing mode, except this is not a hentai d) Some combination of the above. The kind of speculations that makes you question if this is worth reading at all. Not saying I am anywhere near the point of dropping the manga, it was consistently enjoyable so far, but now I am doubting the author's writing ability slightly more.So? Let people speculate then.
Some people have a real problem with separating fiction from reality. It all reminds me of the good old "violence in video games" debate.I liked it.
I Hate snowflakes in the comments so much.
Like bro it's just fiction 🤭
you end up unironically trying to rationalize Pedophilia
Indeed, it's not that deep, this is just borderline lesbian porn drawings, that's it. The ones riling themselves up are people trying to apply real world "moral standarts" to it.thinking anything like this is remotely justifiable by any moral standards
I think you’re missing the point. It depends, it’s alright to say you dislike it, none of them are forcing anyone to do or think anything. But the amount of people just wanting to make the same exact argument in response to them as if it makes any difference is the issue. Pretending this is the same as “violence in videogames” or “people being butthurt” when all that was said is that the scene was jarring. Ironically the ones bringing real world politics are the ones reacting to people who didn’t enjoy the chapter.The ones riling themselves up are people trying to apply real world "moral standarts" to it.
That's your interpretation. I said nothing about her being a klutz. You're way too hyperfixed on this brief moment of inappropriateness. Which comes back to my initial point: we're being more critical of Yamamura because she's an adult, but find ways to justify or forgive Toudou's inappropriateness. It's a double standard that ought to be acknowledged.That's a very specific interpretation of her being a benevolent nurse who's also a klutz who does not know how to behave around minors.
Look at pg 19-20. Yamamura offers to listen to Ookado, who's clearly troubled about her sexuality, and validates her feelings. You don't think that's an important detail? Besides, if she didn't know how to behave herself around minors how would she even have a job here to begin with? She's clearly not a new hire, and I'm sure administion would have her fired if enough of the students find her conduct inappropriate.Not saying you're wrong, future chapters may prove your right, but so far, there was no detail given supporting this theory. No detail at all, in fact
It's not much different from the stereotypical hot female teacher (Ookado does refer to Yamamura with the "sensei" honorific). And something like that is prominent in the doujin scene, even warranting it's own tag.She's a yakuza princess. Yakuza stereotypically are all about submission powerplays, outward sadism and homoeroticism. The first chapter she was introduced in makes her personality clear, then there's a volume-worth of chapters dedicated to fleshing out her character, but even without that, a stereotype is a good starting point. As opposed to that, I have not heard of of nurses being stereotypical child molesters
Again feel free to speculate, but, like I said before, they don't matter. I'm familiar with a lot of Mochi's previous works and I can say that this isn't some radical departure, even in her works that aren't considered hentai.In abscence of any exploration, the speculations might be less about in-manga fanfictions and more about questioning the author's intent. For example, my speculations are a) The author is completely out of touch about what is an approprite way for adults to act around kids b) It was supposed to be a joke which fell flat on its vagina c) The author was in hentai-writing mode, except this is not a hentai d) Some combination of the above. The kind of speculations that makes you question if this is worth reading at all. Not saying I am anywhere near the point of dropping the manga, it was consistently enjoyable so far, but now I am doubting the author's writing ability slightly more.
I think it's a case of the original Japanese using a lot of slang and the translator is trying to keep the spirit by using (mostly american) english slang, though, that's always done at the risk of over localizing the dialogue.WTF? That’s not okay.
Btw, does the japanese actually say ‘full goblin mode’? If so, that’s hilarious
That's what can be inferred from your statements, especially given you still haven't said why did she have to chose such a method to "help" a student, as opposed to doing anything else, and why doing something that could potentially leave lasting negative impact on the student's psyche is something "benevolent"That's your interpretation. I said nothing about her being a klutz.
Suuuure, "brief moment of inappropriateness", lets call it that, it is also basically how the character was introduced, the most prominent of the three tidbits that we were shown about herYou're way too hyperfixed on this brief moment of inappropriateness
It literally does not. I haven't argued that Toudou's actions are excusable, and neither is anyone in the thread as far as I can see. Besides, your point boils down to "let's rank them on their offensiveness and excuse those under certain threshold", instead of judging each transgression on its own.Which comes back to my initial point:
That's baseline responsibilities of a nurse, and we already know she's a nurse, but sure, I'll write down "does minimun of what is required of her" as one of her positive traitsLook at pg 19-20. Yamamura offers to listen to Ookado, who's clearly troubled about her sexuality, and validates her feelings. You don't think that's an important detail?
She literally fingered a student this very chapter, she does not behave herself around minors while being employed as a nurse. I don't need to look for any auxilary signs like "but she was not fired yet" to know she's a sex offender, we witness her being a sex offender.Besides, if she didn't know how to behave herself around minors how would she even have a job here to begin with?
This is not a doujinshi however, those are written for a specific purpose and are meant to be read using a different head. Most of the doujinshi work on the principle of "what if we abolish any consequences and plot consistency", you can forget about their plot right after culmination. Not here however, there is a story with expectances of continuityAnd something like that is prominent in the doujin scene, even warranting it's own tag.
Just fyi, but doctors are also refered to as "sensei" in Japan.(Ookado does refer to Yamamura with the "sensei" honorific).
If an author portrays that "something" positively in their story, this tends to make readers question the author's stance on that "something". Maybe Mochi really thinks that getting more physical with students or patients might be excusable under certain circumstances and if it is for their benefit? Some isekai writers certainly would not mind having a sex slave or a dozen, though the majority most likely write stories like that for escapistic hentai-like reasons. As for Mochi, I personally lean towards mix of b) and c), that is, it being a bad joke transplanted from hentai where the dissonative shock factor of a role-inappropriate behaviour was supposed to be the punchlineJust because an author puts something in their story doesn't mean they are a proponent or advocate of it.