Dex-chan lover
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2023
- Messages
- 186
You know you can call me a woke moralist or whatever but i think if you’re defending pedophilia and rape you aren’t on the ”sane” sidethank you for bringing sanity back to this comment section
You know you can call me a woke moralist or whatever but i think if you’re defending pedophilia and rape you aren’t on the ”sane” sidethank you for bringing sanity back to this comment section
Ephebophile, w/e. The point is that she did something morally-reprehensibly to the extent that there are laws that would've landed her in jail for that.But maybe you should be fully cognizant of the term "pedophile"
You say that she genuinely tried to help a student, but then why did she have to chose such a questinable approach, when she, as an adult, supposedly has had mental capacities to help her in a more role-appropriate manner? I am not saying she did so out of inappropriate feelings towards a minor, but then there's no other motive shown as to why she did that.I see someone genuinely trying to help a troubled student (albeit via questionable means)
I guess that's the problem, I don't see her as anything. All we were shown about her is that she's pretty and she has shlicked off a student, which is, without knowing her motivations, is a completely random action. So far, she's a non-character, and the only way to form an opinion about her is to look at her actions through lens of 3D-worldwhile you see an irredeemable person.
So, by your own logic, you are here consuming child pornography and rape media, gotcha. That’s a totally reasonable take and makes 100% sense, Mr. Sane Person.You know you can call me a woke moralist or whatever but i think if you’re defending pedophilia and rape you aren’t on the ”sane” side
I don't see much of a point in trying to apply moral standards in this manga that pretty much disregards them at almost every opportunity. You can ask the same thing about a lot of the other characters: why don't they do anything sensible or "role-appropriate"? The question is rhetorical because the answer is obvious: that be boring. Or, alternatively, it doesn't align with Mochi's particular style.You say that she genuinely tried to help a student, but then why did she have to chose such a questinable approach, when she, as an adult, supposedly has had mental capacities to help her in a more role-appropriate manner? I am not saying she did so out of inappropriate feelings towards a minor, but then there's no other motive shown as to why she did that.
I...disagree. There's various ways one's perspective on a character can form. Even with characters like Yamamura who was introduced in this very chapter.I guess that's the problem, I don't see her as anything. All we were shown about her is that she's pretty and she has shlicked off a student, which is, without knowing her motivations, is a completely random action. So far, she's a non-character, and the only way to form an opinion about her is to look at her actions through lens of 3D-world
But then "genuinely trying to help" stops applying as wellI don't see much of a point in trying to apply moral standards
I don't need to, their motivations and reasonings are made clear. Toudou for example is shown to be an asshole from the get go, I do not need to question why she drugs up her classmatesYou can ask the same thing about a lot of the other characters
Sure, but whatever they are and with what little we were shown, they are speculations, be it trying to understand her using the real world as an example, or extrapolating manga meta-knowledge to guess what was the author's intentI...disagree. There's various ways one's perspective on a character can form.
What do you mean? It does still apply. Yamamura is the school's nurse. She's doing her job less out of any kind of moral standard and more out of simple contractual obligation.But then "genuinely trying to help" stops applying as well
I did say characters. Plural. You bring up Toudou but she's the FemC. Of course she'd be more flesh out than the others that there's not a real need question a lot of her intentions. The others, arguably, not so much, and to varying degrees since screentime between them is variedI don't need to, their motivations and reasonings are made clear. Toudou for example is shown to be an asshole from the get go, I do not need to question why she drugs up her classmates
It you ask me I honestly don't think it's as deep as you seem to think it is. Yamamura is just a pretty (by Ookado's standards) and eccentric nurse whose actions may betray her well-meaning. That's it. And probably all we'll get if she turns out to be a one-off character.Sure, but whatever they are and with what little we were shown, they are speculations, be it trying to understand her using the real world as an example, or extrapolating manga meta-knowledge to guess what was the author's intent
Arguably it loses the "genuine" part if it is only about adhering to the contract. And that is one hell of a way one could possibly go about fulfilling their contractual obligations.It does still apply.
You were the one to bring her up first, and she is arguably one of the most reprehensible characters in the manga so is kinda relevant to what we're discussing. Do you question the others' intentions, and if so, whom?You bring up Toudou
And, in my opinion, that would be the worst resolution. It is a WTF moment, and abandoning it without any further exploration would leave the viewers to their own speculations, which are predominantly negativeThat's it. And probably all we'll get if she turns out to be a one-off character.
Regardless you know what I mean. She's the nurse so it's her job to administer aid to any injured students. She just so happened to offer some very direct help to a student who wanted some guidance. We all understand how inappropriate and extra she was being. No one is saying otherwise.Arguably it loses the "genuine" part if it is only about adhering to the contract. And that is one hell of a way one could possibly go about fulfilling their contractual obligations.
Ok...me bring her up first has nothing to do with anything. I'm not even saying or implying she is irrelevant to the discussion (because she is relevant), so I don't know where you got that notion from.You were the one to bring her up first, and she is arguably one of the most reprehensible characters in the manga so is kinda relevant to what we're discussing. Do you question the others' intentions, and if so, whom?
So? Let people speculate then. Their theories, positive or negative, don't matter. I'm only operating off what is shown and said in the chapter itself and I stand by my evaluation of Yamamura: a questionable nurse who nonetheless wants to help her students in any way she can. If she returns and this gets readressed, then great. My evaluation may even change. But this isn't worth exploring any further; there are other characters, especially those with unexplored or unresolved plot points, who should take priority.And, in my opinion, that would be the worst resolution. It is a WTF moment, and abandoning it without any further exploration would leave the viewers to their own speculations, which are predominantly negative
Thank you Black Rose! Also, Happy Birthday!!! Sincerely appreciate all your hard work!!
wtf, bro now I'm curiousIm tempted to quote a certain character from South Park but my consciousness is telling me that i shouldnt do it...