Fukushuu o Koinegau Saikyou Yuusha wa, Yami no Chikara de Senmetsu Musou Suru - Vol. 10 Ch. 70

[dowiet]

Hell God certainly has some unique tastes

 

[HailBritannia_]

There's quite a lot of irony in your statement when you try to define what the author is thinking within your own narrow definitions, then use that to insult them.

For example, you apply an analogy about the child because that is your immediate understanding of the implied relationship between humans and creator deities. Objectively, not all creation myth follows that. Subjectively, the author is most certainly not, simply because it's as you say, an obvious logical fault otherwise.

Or, to you, someone who passes commentary on religion is some kind of echo chamber denizen. Further irony that to you, that is typified as 'Reddit', when almost certainly the author has never visited the site. Sure, pointing that out may seem pedantic, just replace it with some Japanese equivalent. But putting aside that the Japanese don't quite have anything as unhealthy as that social stewing pot, it just further indicates your tendency to define the author's thinking within your worldview.

what is this load of crap? The author's reasoning is faulty, you have not provided a valid interpretation of it that would make it more sensical, so it is just a poor comment by the author. You were right about one thing though: your comment regarding reddit was just pedantic.

 

[vannn]

Little disappointed in the king of hell visual design. No real cohesion out side of “monster”. Communicates nothing, can’t tell anything about his personality or history. Why does he have nipple mouths? “Cause.”


He looks like a power ranger’s villain.

 

[Grikath]

Little disappointed in the king of hell visual design. No real cohesion out side of “monster”. Communicates nothing, can’t tell anything about his personality or history. Why does he have nipple mouths? “Cause.”


He looks like a power ranger’s villain.

You forgot the Impossibly Spiky Codpiece....

 

[ZeroBRS]

Raoul, I love you man but...that doesn't make a lick of sense. That's like saying if you have a kid that one day becomes a serial killer, you're just as evil because he's your kid. That comment felt so out of place considering we JUST learned that the gods get off on suffering and damnation like it's televised porn.

Maybe my english is just bad but when did Raoul say god bad cos human do bad thing?
Don't Raoul just mean that even god is not perfect (in this case always righteous and good) because they can't (or just choice to not) make a "perfect being"?
Basically I think, he mean god expect human to do bad thing just to punish them. Hence "it's fascinating how it was god who created all of these, isn't it".

 

[Hitspark]

Maybe my english is just bad but when did Raoul say god bad cos human do bad thing?
Don't Raoul just mean that even god is not perfect (in this case always righteous and good) because they can't (or just choice to not) make a "perfect being"?
Basically I think, he mean god expect human to do bad thing just to punish them. Hence "it's fascinating how it was god who created all of these, isn't it".

That's an interesting way to take it for sure but there is still the implication that the gods are bad because of it. Look at it like this he says:

Nonetheless there are all sorts of execution grounds aren't there? Although they exist to punish sinners, it's fascinating how god created all these. On earth the gods are believed to be pure, righteous and always good. Even though it was god who created human beings as well, hmm?

Or (if you read it this way)

Nonetheless there are all sorts of execution grounds aren't there? Although they exist to punish sinners, it's fascinating how god created all these. Even though it was god who created human beings as well, hmm? On earth the gods are believed to be pure, righteous and always good.

In either case, Raoul is making a direct implication that it's odd the gods get to punish people even though they created people. The idea being that the gods somehow have a direct responsibility for the actions of humans (whether they expected evil deeds or not). My issue is that Humans being evil and getting punished for said evil has nothing to do with the morality of the gods at all.

The gods could be pure evil beings who rape puppies on the daily, that doesn't mean it's their fault if some guy freely chooses to shoot his wife and kids because they smiled at him. It's also not wrong of them to send that dude to hell for it, just because they're worse.

(Obviously the argument could be made that there should be a more just deity dealing out punishments, but that's irrelevant to if justice is being served or not. We've all seen the scene where the a baddy gets beatdown by a bigger villain after they've done something terrible to the MC. The MC may not get his revenge but the audience is typically satisfied. Why? Because justice was still served, even if it came at the hand of someone worse than the bad guy.)

The gods of the story are evil because they choose to be, because they don't value life or morality, they view cruelty and suffering as a sport and a show to be enjoyed and so on. So it's weird that Raoul makes the connection that human actions is on the hands of the gods because they also punish them.

We just saw one of the gods directly causing the damnation of her servant and a bunch of other people, why is that not the point he brings up? He clearly knew about it. The idea that the gods intentionally set humans up for failure for amusement, and thus have a direct connection to his death, would be a stronger monologue imo. Who knows, maybe that's where the author meant to take it but worded it wrong. But for now, it's just a curious thought from Raoul everything considered.

 

[obsidianpassion]

Why is Raoul so confident when he does not have a way to harm or kill these gods yet?

Also hell god is going to punish him by bringing back his enemies?

 

[Inferno_Ablaze]

Why are the nipples censored? I cri

This was likely translated out of the magazine version instead of the volume version. I'm actually willing to wait for the volume version, and if possible, an official translation, to come out if it means getting it uncensored, but fan translations always go for the magazine version since that's what's released first. I wouldn't consider this manga to be an ecchi or erotica, but the publisher Suiyoubi wa Mattari Dash X Comic mainly serializes fantasy/ isekai manga with harem/ ecchi/ erotica themes so your guess is as good as mine as to why they censor, other than to promote volume sales.

 

[The_H_Guy]

Raoul, I love you man but...that doesn't make a lick of sense. That's like saying if you have a kid that one day becomes a serial killer, you're just as evil because he's your kid. That comment felt so out of place considering we JUST learned that the gods get off on suffering and damnation like it's televised porn. Like, is that really the best comparison we could make with that knowledge?

Or is this coming directly from Author-san as a pseudo-intellectual comment at religion? C'mon author-san, stop scrolling reddit and go to bed.

Weird comments aside. Can't wait to see these guys all get wrecked again. Raoul may very well allow himself to lose for a bit to have some fun or to get closer to the scythe. It'll be fun to see.

I think is more on the line that gods have created "evil" themselves than being responsible for the actions of evil people. Humans are corruptible and imperfect beings cause the gods wanted them to be that way.

 

[The_H_Guy]

I swear man If this mf somehow eliminates every god… I swear dude

He'll probably do it. Gods in anime and manga, but even japanese folklore (just read about Son Wukong, the monkey king/god, he basically made the japanese olympus his bitches) are very pathetic.
Any shonen protagonist can dickslap them back to heaven no problem.

 

[The_H_Guy]

Why are the nipples censored? I cri

Cause many scanlators have the bad manners of not using the volume's raws, and even worst to not update the chapters to the uncensored version when they become available.
Very, very bad.

 

[Hitspark]

I think is more on the line that gods have created "evil" themselves than being responsible for the actions of evil people. Humans are corruptible and imperfect beings cause the gods wanted them to be that way.

This is actually a really good interpretation and I hope this is the way it's leaning because we did see one of the gods purposely causing damnation.

 

[Anderan90]

Why is Raoul so confident when he does not have a way to harm or kill these gods yet?

Because he's the MC with invulnerable plot armor.

 

[spamtrashed]

Thanks for all the hard work you put into scanlating for us! (^_^)

 

[Akikako]

plot twist: the god summon them, only to see Raul's "art"

 

[Kurbo]

Did this guy just diss free will? People do shitty things because they can, not because some god made them like that.

 

[beep_repair]

I guess spines were on sale at Pottery Barn when they decorated the castle.

 

[MiguelH224]

"Oh thanks, you just gave me the chance to torture them all over again!"
Welp, we now know the gods aren't the brightest beings.

Hmm, chick on the far left.....is that the researcher? Can't be the princess since she's still technically alive.

Yep that's the Doc

 

[Latte10]

Man just casually ordered them around lol