Member
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2019
- Messages
- 61
@alidan
I'll only talk about a couple of points because I don't really have that much knowledge on most of your points save a few.
1) The question is why wouldn't areas be overzealous? This was a novel virus so little was known, if anything at the time it was the right call to be that fanatical. Like you said we'll see if the lockdowns were truly working but better to be wrong then horribly wrong.
2) A few areas hit bad is more than enough to encourage flattening the curve in other areas. Accounting for the fact that some states/areas do not have the same access to medical care as others (Alaska for an example). Sure it was not that bad in most places but the fact that it can happen does not help that point. Not only that but the fact that medical bills can be outrageous even with insurance (but not much jobs mean no insurance from work + a lot of people live paycheck-to-paycheck) is a detriment itself. We really don't know any long-term side effects of catching COVID.
3) Few deaths were only from COVID (since there was an additional factor = disease, etc) is supported by the numbers but we need to remember deaths that we count things as COVID is a common and justified practice. Example, someone does not die due to cancer alone but the complications it causes to the rest of the body. By introducing COVID into a patient's equation then that can be considered the cause for that was the reason of the patient not being able to recover. Does your example of motorcyclist deaths take into account the amount of those who caught COVID in any point of time (including a stay at the hospital) and then passing away? To emphasize the point, COVID can be very well the reason why a patient passes away due to the complications it causes.
I'll only talk about a couple of points because I don't really have that much knowledge on most of your points save a few.
1) The question is why wouldn't areas be overzealous? This was a novel virus so little was known, if anything at the time it was the right call to be that fanatical. Like you said we'll see if the lockdowns were truly working but better to be wrong then horribly wrong.
2) A few areas hit bad is more than enough to encourage flattening the curve in other areas. Accounting for the fact that some states/areas do not have the same access to medical care as others (Alaska for an example). Sure it was not that bad in most places but the fact that it can happen does not help that point. Not only that but the fact that medical bills can be outrageous even with insurance (but not much jobs mean no insurance from work + a lot of people live paycheck-to-paycheck) is a detriment itself. We really don't know any long-term side effects of catching COVID.
3) Few deaths were only from COVID (since there was an additional factor = disease, etc) is supported by the numbers but we need to remember deaths that we count things as COVID is a common and justified practice. Example, someone does not die due to cancer alone but the complications it causes to the rest of the body. By introducing COVID into a patient's equation then that can be considered the cause for that was the reason of the patient not being able to recover. Does your example of motorcyclist deaths take into account the amount of those who caught COVID in any point of time (including a stay at the hospital) and then passing away? To emphasize the point, COVID can be very well the reason why a patient passes away due to the complications it causes.