@Zephyr247 I don't totally disagree, I'd assume nearly all nobles were like her, on the other hand, it has been noted that the saint lady did actively do lots of good supposedly, the guy also was fervent in 'righting wrongs', and the country girl, if nothing else is a 'pseudo noble'. Still a noble, but one of infinitely less power than than most others it seems.
I mean don't get me wrong I'm of the opinion that in such a system all nobles are inherently at fault to a degree, so those 3 aren't just great people, but I don't think they're totally hypocrites either, at least. I would agree it was at least partially personal, but not unjustified as such.
The idea that it's bad really falls to how many other people were also executed IMO, if they did wholly scapegoat her and most other nobles got off scot-free, then they definitely simply let grudges carry them forward, if the vast majority of the nobility also got taken out, pretty much all but those that actively helped the cause of commoners, and maybe those low enough influence to not realistically have the means, then Mia's treatment seems reasonable. How it was we'll probably never see, but it is interesting to think about.
All in all, yeah, I agree that they did vilify her more than necessary for what was largely ignorance and not particularly outside the norm of nobles, but I also don't think she necessarily deserved special exemption amidst getting rid of bad nobles. I mean hell, super early on even mentioned how she said things like "let them eat meat", a reference to the famous "let them eat cake" line, something considered particularly inciteful of revolution, even if it wasn't actually said by Marie Antoinette, in this case, Mia did say the equivalent, while also indeed living an extravagant lifestyle which personally could've solved all the problems of her country (and totally will in this redo) which is more than many nobles actually could've done indvidually, not to say some individuals or many gathered couldn't have.
There is an inherent burden of being royalty, holding the most power (as non figureheads, she seems to have acted like a figurehead but genuinely had funds to not be one) also comes with responsibility to the people, which she did wholly fail to fulfill in the original world. All these nobles owed the commoners better too, but she had the most to give of them, besides from presumably her parents, who yeah.
Notably when she was executed she was 20, if they'd actively killed her off while she was this age it would've been vile, and granted, these 3 did already set their eyes on her, but didn't actively do it til she was already older, at least... Certainly the older royals would be the most responsible, I think she might be next in line of responsibility though. Even if not too far ahead any higher up noble, all the nobles were at fault, just yeah. .
Anyways, I don't totally disagree, the notion of befriending the ones who murdered you is a bit much, I do believe that if she chooses to like them over time that's okay, but if she chose to permanently avoid them regardless of future treatment, she'd also be in the right. I also agree the fact those 3 were nobles, even if they did act differently than she did, are less justified than if they weren't nobles.
Ultimately Mia probably did lots of things in her original timeline that further and further justified her death, and we'll continue to see some of these events in the future, after all her diary still isn't sorted out despite the things she's done so far, and some things we'll never see. Either way, pretty good story, eh? Most villainess series couldn't get this kind of discussion I think.