I really expecting that you would throw these and you actually did it. Lol. Is that habit of yours to do sarcasm in opposing discussion? Ahahaha... Have some shame dude.
Anyway, what you show is just an assumption of the person that actually have a counter opinion in later chapter. You are too quick to make judgement if this is what it took for you to accuse someone.
Later part of story said,
1.
The brat actually know nothing about his situation in his home. He was not kidnapped by myriad. There is a chance that he actually being turned over by the kidnapper to n person and then being bought by myriad. He is indeed got bed and not a cramped room in the mansion. Myriad took proper care to their slaves.
2.
This is the counter opinion that myriad are not trading underground slaves. They are containing it to give them tags. It's basic human rights to have a tag. And he claimed that even the 'guild' neglected to care about underground slaves.
Next page explained that there is someone that setting up the hunting of myriad company. It's accused myriad trading the underground slaves. It was made by obviously the competitor of course. Myriad company is the one who monopolies slave trade, they can crush a new illegal slave trades surrounding them. It's a good way to control the demands of slave need. But of course the other strong competitors wouldn't like it.
3.
At last, here is the real culprit that kidnapped the other 2 kids. Complete with the reason he does that.
Well, at least you are admitting yourself that you are indeed know nothing