Yeah, you're totally not attention-seeking, raving, desperate, unhinged, and obsessed with being right on insignificant issues. I particularly enjoyed the failure to realize sarcasm, while also misspelling psychoanalysis even when copying the word from just a few pixels away. This paragraph is sarcasm by the way. In case you didn't get it.
You...do whatever you want. You have my permission(?), since you feel such a strong need to elucidate your actions and how they're justified and totally not deranged. But if you ask me, you should probably just re-read your own posts, without thinking about mine if that helps, and maybe you'll understand why I'm so flippant, as you say. Hope things work out for you...
Oh for Christ's sake... this is exactly why you've had no leg to stand on from the very beggining. You don't know the meaning of the words you use, making me correct you all the time and then even having the gall to say I'm the confused one. Alright, let's get it over with: sarcams and irony are not synonyms, they do not mean the same thing. So no, you can't use them interchangeably. Where the hell does that confidence come from, anyway? It's funny you mentioned flat earthers before, because they have the same attitude: confidently wrong and unwilling to admit to any fault, only offering excuses as to how what they said "actually meant this and this". They also argue in bad faith and think it's a good idea to attack the opponent if they're having a hard time attacking the argument. It's like you've been raised on their playbook.
Honestly, this is just pathetic. You've gone from sleazy politician-style arguing, through repeating yourself like a broken record, ad-hominems, throwing back my own words at me, like a kindergartner, now you're at the level of bringing up faulty spelling as proof of superiority? On one hand I'm tempted to spellcheck you now, but... nah. Even old weeaboos like me have to have some standards. You can have this one, all yours. I'm sure everyone will be impressed.
Re-read my posts you say? So, the old "do your own research" and find out for yourself where exactly the problems lie. Because you're above citing anything, as you've already said. You just make statements and expect to be taken at your word, just like flat earthers. Damn, every time I'm thinking "wouldn't it be funny if this guy actually was an X?" you come out and act more and more like X and it immediately stops being funny. Can't you just pick one brand of being awful and stick with it? Hell, even the "you deserve hostility" angle is better than everything at once... BTW: I fixed some spellings, so no freebies!
