I think it's just an easy fictional shorthand, because showing something more realistic as a creation is a lot harder.It always bugs me when manga about artists ends up with with them simply reproducing their own lived experiences in their art.
Oftentimes, it feels lazy, because the author then doesn't have to come up with a story within a story to present to the audience, they can just say 'the MC drew what happened in the actual chapter that you, dear reader, just read'
It also doesn't feel realistic, because even though drawing from your own lived experience is a perfectly normal thing for an artist to do, it makes no sense to be a complete copy, because then you're just a one-hit wonder. You're not really an artist at that point, you're just an autobiographer.
It makes me sad because it really could be done so much better. I always remember in the movie 'Liz and the Blue Bird' how there was this entire secondary plot being presented every few scenes which depicted the entire Blue Bird story and the audience could read between the lines that the story matched with what was happening in the 'actual' story of the film about the two girls in the band who were practicing to play the particular orchestral piece depicting this story. So even if the stories were clearly correlated, they were still unique in their own way and it was interesting seeing how the girls were 'approaching' the play.
I think stories about manga artists and writers could be so much stronger if they had similar secondary stories happening within the manga which were the product of the main character, but the way in which the story relates to the 'main' plot of the story would be kept subtle so that there was still value in presenting this 'story within a story'.
Alas, this manga is like a B-movie so this sort of criticism is a bit overkill, but still, just my two cents.
It's a common advice for drawing. Write what you know. But usually it involved some abstraction and remodelling. And in a story, a story within the story is almost always less complex, since it has far less page-time to appear in.It always bugs me when manga about artists ends up with with them simply reproducing their own lived experiences in their art.
When he becomes a successful mangaka and she becomes a successful seiyuu...Thanks for the chapter!
Wedding when?
Nothing weird about it, they are well regarded cans that a bunch of regular people use. I say do itThe other day I was looking into buying some headphones, and I decided to get a set of those Marshall Major cans that Koi-chan wears. They’re nice headphones, but is that weird? I feel like that’s weird.
I think I understand what you mean, but I believe in the case of our two protagonists this wouldn't fit because they're in the situation of being in a time crunch needing improve their skills quickly while also coming up many new drafts, and since the focus of this story is more the romance between the two, it's more about the feeling of trying to become an author and trying to learn while also enjoying the proccess more then developing the story of the work itself. I think there would be the space for that after one of them gets serialized (did Uehara get a spot after winning the award? I can't remember), but even then it'd probably just be snippets, as there's already a lot going on in the story and it'd be something almost completely new.It always bugs me when manga about artists ends up with with them simply reproducing their own lived experiences in their art.
Oftentimes, it feels lazy, because the author then doesn't have to come up with a story within a story to present to the audience, they can just say 'the MC drew what happened in the actual chapter that you, dear reader, just read'
It also doesn't feel realistic, because even though drawing from your own lived experience is a perfectly normal thing for an artist to do, it makes no sense to be a complete copy, because then you're just a one-hit wonder. You're not really an artist at that point, you're just an autobiographer.
It makes me sad because it really could be done so much better. I always remember in the movie 'Liz and the Blue Bird' how there was this entire secondary plot being presented every few scenes which depicted the entire Blue Bird story and the audience could read between the lines that the story matched with what was happening in the 'actual' story of the film about the two girls in the band who were practicing to play the particular orchestral piece depicting this story. So even if the stories were clearly correlated, they were still unique in their own way and it was interesting seeing how the girls were 'approaching' the play.
I think stories about manga artists and writers could be so much stronger if they had similar secondary stories happening within the manga which were the product of the main character, but the way in which the story relates to the 'main' plot of the story would be kept subtle so that there was still value in presenting this 'story within a story'.
Alas, this manga is like a B-movie so this sort of criticism is a bit overkill, but still, just my two cents.