Sorry, you've misunderstood. I got you though. And I was being critical of the story, just fyi.
You really replied after more than two weeks, acting like Kiyotaka Ayanokoji or Nikocado Avocado "I'm always two steps ahead" ass. "I got you" lmfao what, bro thinks we're playing chess. "You fell into my trap" ahh comment.
Keep in mind, you were the one who engaged in ad hominem first, probably as a response to some sort of trigger. So maybe try not doing that this time, big man
This, "I've never liked tsunderes. I think there's mentally something wrong with people who like tsunderes.", is what the sensitive comment was about. "I don't like girls who are kind of rude and anyone who does is mentally ill" makes you sound sensitive.
Makes me sound sensitive, to YOU. Your out of place whining also makes you look like a little bitch, but I didn't say that to you did I? That's the thing buddy, we don't say some things even if we feel like it. My comment made you feel uncomfortable, big whoop. So you decide to randomly slap a label on me and announce it? What do you think my reply to that should be?
"Plenty of people who had a traumatic past write a story about it where they DON'T have a traumatic past." True. The key point is the traumatic past doesn't exist.
I don't know if you don't understand how English works or what, but this sentence literally doesn't make sense to anyone that is reading this. Lmao you said "True" and agreed with my point where I explicitly said "There exists people who had a traumatic past and write stories where they don't have a traumatic past (stories being wish-fulfillment stories)" and then proceeded to say "The key point is the traumatic past doesn't exist" like what. Are you denying the existence of mangaka who had traumatic pasts or what, because that's quite literally how the sentence comes off as, whether you meant it or not.
But what they probably don't do is write stories where the traumatic past happens but the fix is as simple as a small change like hair cutting.
You're just agreeing with yourself lmao. You have literally no basis for that. At least I provided logic—logic that states mangaka who went through struggles in their early life often makes stories the complete opposite of it as a coping mechanism. Fujiko F. Fujio was bullied as a child and experienced war and poverty, he ended up creating one of the most beautiful and colorful worlds ever created, the world of Doraemon. Sorachi has talked about depression several times, yet he created Gintama, a work completely opposite of anything negative like that.
Plenty of people in the manga/anime/light novel industry have depression because of their insane work schedule. So how can you guarantee me that there exists no mangaka who had a tough past but their work reflects the complete opposite?
Remember, your point is that "uhm uhm but authors who had a traumatic don't write stories where the fix is as simple as a small change". It does, they are called "wish-fulfillment stories". I literally said that to you in my previous comment but sentences are too hard for you to grasp.
Cuz it's just going to feel disingenuous, like it does. Case in point, even writing a manga to fix the trauma is way more work then just going to a good barber.
Okay, now I don't know what you're waffling about anymore. "It feels disingenous" it's a you issue buddy. YOU feel like that. Keep your feelings to yourself man. Nobody else feels that way. Feels disingenous lmao to who??? That is just such a braindead thing to say.
They write wish-fulfillment manga because it is a COPING MECHANISM. Do you know what that means or do I need to chatgpt explain it to you? How is that same as going to the barber? Let me explain it like you're 5 years old.
Mangaka depressed in early life--->Mangaka makes a wish-fulfillment manga where he self-inserts as MC, and MC is the best looking person on Earth, gets all the bitches, and beats everyone up--->Mangaka is coping but that is completely valid and fine--->Everyone including the author reads the manga and has fun
Now explain to me how that is the same as... going to a barber??? Literally makes no sense lmao.
What's funny is you clearly have no idea what you're talking about. You just wanted to say something and prove somebody wrong. If you're gonna keep going "uhm cuz cuz actually uhh barber" then you might as well just talk to yourself cause this is pointless.